Proceedings of the ... International Conference on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering, Volume 5American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 2001 - Arctic regions |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 64
Page 73
They are derived from Fourier transforms of function H , ( W ) such as in the following equation : 1 , we " ( = ) ( 7 ) 21 where H , ( W ) is the frequency response function of the 1st order wave force .
They are derived from Fourier transforms of function H , ( W ) such as in the following equation : 1 , we " ( = ) ( 7 ) 21 where H , ( W ) is the frequency response function of the 1st order wave force .
Page 155
We assume , to cubic order in nonlinearity , that the wave dynamics are governed by the nonlinear Schroedinger ( NLS ) equation . We identify two parameters in the power spectrum that control the nonlinear dynamics : the Phillips ...
We assume , to cubic order in nonlinearity , that the wave dynamics are governed by the nonlinear Schroedinger ( NLS ) equation . We identify two parameters in the power spectrum that control the nonlinear dynamics : the Phillips ...
Page 156
This parameter , which is a kind of ” Ursell ” number ( Osborne and Petti , 1994 ) , can be obtained as the ratio of the nonlinear and dispersive terms in the TNLS equation : E Ur = ( ة ) ...
This parameter , which is a kind of ” Ursell ” number ( Osborne and Petti , 1994 ) , can be obtained as the ratio of the nonlinear and dispersive terms in the TNLS equation : E Ur = ( ة ) ...
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Contents
OMAE2001OSU5019 | 93 |
OMAE2001OSU5021 | 101 |
OMAE2001OSU5022 | 111 |
Copyright | |
32 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
amplitude analysis angle applied arrangement assumed beam bending body bottom breakwater bridge calculated chamber coefficient compared components concept Conference considered construction deformation depth described developed device direction displacement distribution dynamic effect elastic element Engineering equation evaluate experiment experimental field Figure floating structure flow force frequency function girder horizontal hydrodynamic hydroelastic increase International irregular waves Japan layer length linear load maneuvers mass mean measured Mega-Float method mode modules mooring motion observed obtained ocean Offshore operation performance position predicted present pressure problem Proceedings ratio reduce reef region Research respectively response rigid scale ship shown shows side significant simulation spectrum submerged plate surface Table Tokyo turbine University vertical VLFS wave energy wave height wave period wind