## Proceedings of the ... International Conference on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering, Volume 5American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 2001 - Arctic regions |

### From inside the book

Results 1-3 of 64

Page 73

... respectively , in evaluating drift forces . h ( T ) and h , ( T ) are the impulse

response function of the 1st and the 2nd order wave force , respectively . They

are derived from Fourier transforms of function H ( W ) such as in the following

... respectively , in evaluating drift forces . h ( T ) and h , ( T ) are the impulse

response function of the 1st and the 2nd order wave force , respectively . They

are derived from Fourier transforms of function H ( W ) such as in the following

**equation**...Page 155

We assume , to cubic order in nonlinearity , that the wave dynamics are governed

by the nonlinear Schroedinger ( NLS )

the power spectrum that control the nonlinear dynamics : the Phillips parameter ...

We assume , to cubic order in nonlinearity , that the wave dynamics are governed

by the nonlinear Schroedinger ( NLS )

**equation**. We identify two parameters inthe power spectrum that control the nonlinear dynamics : the Phillips parameter ...

Page 156

Formally , the NLS

banded and the steepness is small . For small values of y ( y = 1 , 2 ) the

spectrum is not narrow banded ; as y increases the spectrum becomes narrower (

A010 , = 0 ...

Formally , the NLS

**equation**is derived assuming that the spectrum is narrowbanded and the steepness is small . For small values of y ( y = 1 , 2 ) the

spectrum is not narrow banded ; as y increases the spectrum becomes narrower (

A010 , = 0 ...

### What people are saying - Write a review

We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.

### Contents

OMAE2001OSU5019 | 93 |

OMAE2001OSU5021 | 101 |

A Ship Maneuvering Control Framework | 111 |

Copyright | |

30 other sections not shown

### Other editions - View all

### Common terms and phrases

amplitude analysis angle applied assumed basin beach bending body bottom breakwater bridge calculated changes characteristics coefficient compared components concept Conference considered construction deformation depth developed direction displacement distribution dynamic effects elastic element Engineering equation evaluate experiment experimental field Figure floating structure flow force frequency function girder hindcast horizontal hydrodynamic hydroelastic International Japan layer length linear load marine mass mean measured Mega-Float method mode modules mooring motion numerical observed obtained ocean offshore operation performance plate predicted present pressure problem Proceedings reduce region regular waves Research respectively response rigid ship shoreline shown shows side significant simulation spectrum storm submerged plate surface Table turbine University vertical displacements VLFS wave energy wave height wave period wind