Proceedings of the ... International Conference on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering, Volume 5American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 2001 - Arctic regions |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 66
Page 39
( 2 ) Reduce wave load by installing wave energy absorbing devices on the edge of Mega - Float structure . Wave & Wind Direction By these two ways , wave load which Mega - Float structure receives is reduced drastically .
( 2 ) Reduce wave load by installing wave energy absorbing devices on the edge of Mega - Float structure . Wave & Wind Direction By these two ways , wave load which Mega - Float structure receives is reduced drastically .
Page 182
Frooboard vs Vertical Load , Stillwater scale ) illustrate the dependence of the drag force on the current speed and the loading conditions , respectively . VHC predicts the drag force well in the moderate range of the current speeds ...
Frooboard vs Vertical Load , Stillwater scale ) illustrate the dependence of the drag force on the current speed and the loading conditions , respectively . VHC predicts the drag force well in the moderate range of the current speeds ...
Page 183
15 20 25 upstroom bow trueboard ( n ) applied load = 17280 lbs applied load = 69120 lbs applied load = 17280 lbs ( VHC ) applied load - 69120 lbs ( VHC ) THE MOBILE OFFSHORE BASE AS PROGENITOR opposed roller bumpers will.
15 20 25 upstroom bow trueboard ( n ) applied load = 17280 lbs applied load = 69120 lbs applied load = 17280 lbs ( VHC ) applied load - 69120 lbs ( VHC ) THE MOBILE OFFSHORE BASE AS PROGENITOR opposed roller bumpers will.
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Contents
OMAE2001OSU5019 | 93 |
OMAE2001OSU5021 | 101 |
OMAE2001OSU5022 | 111 |
Copyright | |
32 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
amplitude analysis angle applied arrangement assumed beam bending body bottom breakwater bridge calculated chamber coefficient compared components concept Conference considered construction deformation depth described developed device direction displacement distribution dynamic effect elastic element Engineering equation evaluate experiment experimental field Figure floating structure flow force frequency function girder horizontal hydrodynamic hydroelastic increase International irregular waves Japan layer length linear load maneuvers mass mean measured Mega-Float method mode modules mooring motion observed obtained ocean Offshore operation performance position predicted present pressure problem Proceedings ratio reduce reef region Research respectively response rigid scale ship shown shows side significant simulation spectrum submerged plate surface Table Tokyo turbine University vertical VLFS wave energy wave height wave period wind
Bibliographic information
| Title | Proceedings of the ... International Conference on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering, Volume 5 |
| Contributors | OMAE Conference Committee, American Society of Mechanical Engineers, American Society of Mechanical Engineers. Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering Division |
| Publisher | American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 2001 |
| Original from | the University of Michigan |
| Digitized | 4 Dec 2007 |
| ISBN | 0791835383, 9780791835388 |
| Export Citation | BiBTeX EndNote RefMan |