Proceedings of the ... International Conference on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering, Volume 5American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 2001 - Arctic regions |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 66
Page 39
( 2 ) Reduce wave load by installing wave energy absorbing devices on the edge
of Mega - Float structure . Wave & Wind Direction By these two ways , wave load
which Mega - Float structure receives is reduced drastically . Fig . 6 shows hybrid
...
( 2 ) Reduce wave load by installing wave energy absorbing devices on the edge
of Mega - Float structure . Wave & Wind Direction By these two ways , wave load
which Mega - Float structure receives is reduced drastically . Fig . 6 shows hybrid
...
Page 182
Frooboard vs Vertical Load , Stillwator scale ) illustrate the dependence of the
drag force on the current speed and the loading conditions , respectively . VHC
predicts the drag force well in the moderate range of the current speeds and
loading ...
Frooboard vs Vertical Load , Stillwator scale ) illustrate the dependence of the
drag force on the current speed and the loading conditions , respectively . VHC
predicts the drag force well in the moderate range of the current speeds and
loading ...
Page 183
Streamwise Force on Bridge vs Applied Load 100000 under - predicted . Wave -
making resistance and lift are being implemented currently , to increase the
accuracy of the calculations . It is anticipated that the inclusion of these problems
will ...
Streamwise Force on Bridge vs Applied Load 100000 under - predicted . Wave -
making resistance and lift are being implemented currently , to increase the
accuracy of the calculations . It is anticipated that the inclusion of these problems
will ...
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Contents
OMAE2001OSU5019 | 93 |
OMAE2001OSU5021 | 101 |
A Ship Maneuvering Control Framework | 111 |
Copyright | |
30 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
amplitude analysis angle applied assumed basin beach bending body bottom breakwater bridge calculated changes characteristics coefficient compared components concept Conference considered construction deformation depth developed direction displacement distribution dynamic effects elastic element Engineering equation evaluate experiment experimental field Figure floating structure flow force frequency function girder hindcast horizontal hydrodynamic hydroelastic International Japan layer length linear load marine mass mean measured Mega-Float method mode modules mooring motion numerical observed obtained ocean offshore operation performance plate predicted present pressure problem Proceedings reduce region regular waves Research respectively response rigid ship shoreline shown shows side significant simulation spectrum storm submerged plate surface Table turbine University vertical displacements VLFS wave energy wave height wave period wind