Proceedings of the ... International Conference on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering, Volume 5American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 2001 - Arctic regions |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 30
Page 15
An analysis of the influence of the detail of wave height and period statistics on the amual production of ... Among other statistics , wave energy resource studies usually produce the scatter diagram , i.e. the probability of ...
An analysis of the influence of the detail of wave height and period statistics on the amual production of ... Among other statistics , wave energy resource studies usually produce the scatter diagram , i.e. the probability of ...
Page 17
Non - presented results show that there is no obvious relation between the value of K and the range of significant wave heights or periods with relative higher level of electricity production . Design parameters These values result from ...
Non - presented results show that there is no obvious relation between the value of K and the range of significant wave heights or periods with relative higher level of electricity production . Design parameters These values result from ...
Page 18
800 kW • 900 kW 900 kW 0,2 50 100 150 200 0,2 50 100 150 200 K ( Pa.s / m3 ) K ( Pa.s / m3 ) Figure 1 - Annual production of electricity at Iceland Figure 2 - Annual production of electricity at Pico 1,0 O 0,8 0,8 OOD O O D ( GWh / year ] ...
800 kW • 900 kW 900 kW 0,2 50 100 150 200 0,2 50 100 150 200 K ( Pa.s / m3 ) K ( Pa.s / m3 ) Figure 1 - Annual production of electricity at Iceland Figure 2 - Annual production of electricity at Pico 1,0 O 0,8 0,8 OOD O O D ( GWh / year ] ...
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Contents
OMAE2001OSU5019 | 93 |
OMAE2001OSU5021 | 101 |
OMAE2001OSU5022 | 111 |
Copyright | |
32 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
amplitude analysis angle applied arrangement assumed beam bending body bottom breakwater bridge calculated chamber coefficient compared components concept Conference considered construction deformation depth described developed device direction displacement distribution dynamic effect elastic element Engineering equation evaluate experiment experimental field Figure floating structure flow force frequency function girder horizontal hydrodynamic hydroelastic increase International irregular waves Japan layer length linear load maneuvers mass mean measured Mega-Float method mode modules mooring motion observed obtained ocean Offshore operation performance position predicted present pressure problem Proceedings ratio reduce reef region Research respectively response rigid scale ship shown shows side significant simulation spectrum submerged plate surface Table Tokyo turbine University vertical VLFS wave energy wave height wave period wind