Proceedings of the ... International Conference on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering, Volume 5American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 2001 - Arctic regions |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 69
Page 218
In addition , the outer sea and rubble - mound breakwater areas named “ C - zone and “ R - zone " , respectively . The water plane area and the water volume of Uchiumi are about 6,600 m2 and 10,000 min average , respectively , and over ...
In addition , the outer sea and rubble - mound breakwater areas named “ C - zone and “ R - zone " , respectively . The water plane area and the water volume of Uchiumi are about 6,600 m2 and 10,000 min average , respectively , and over ...
Page 335
Wave angles are 45 , 90 , 135 degrees , respectively . The wave height H * and wave period T * of offshore waves are 0.112m and 1.61s , respectively . The significant double amplitude of vertical displacement Zinis smaller than the ...
Wave angles are 45 , 90 , 135 degrees , respectively . The wave height H * and wave period T * of offshore waves are 0.112m and 1.61s , respectively . The significant double amplitude of vertical displacement Zinis smaller than the ...
Page 336
Table 4 shows the mooring forces at the point MF4 and MF6 for regular wave , single - directional irregular waves , and multi - directional irregular waves , respectively . The offshore significant wave heights H13 * are 0.016m for all ...
Table 4 shows the mooring forces at the point MF4 and MF6 for regular wave , single - directional irregular waves , and multi - directional irregular waves , respectively . The offshore significant wave heights H13 * are 0.016m for all ...
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Contents
OMAE2001OSU5019 | 93 |
OMAE2001OSU5021 | 101 |
OMAE2001OSU5022 | 111 |
Copyright | |
32 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
amplitude analysis angle applied arrangement assumed beam bending body bottom breakwater bridge calculated chamber coefficient compared components concept Conference considered construction deformation depth described developed device direction displacement distribution dynamic effect elastic element Engineering equation evaluate experiment experimental field Figure floating structure flow force frequency function girder horizontal hydrodynamic hydroelastic increase International irregular waves Japan layer length linear load maneuvers mass mean measured Mega-Float method mode modules mooring motion observed obtained ocean Offshore operation performance position predicted present pressure problem Proceedings ratio reduce reef region Research respectively response rigid scale ship shown shows side significant simulation spectrum submerged plate surface Table Tokyo turbine University vertical VLFS wave energy wave height wave period wind