Proceedings of the ... International Conference on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering, Volume 5American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 2001 - Arctic regions |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 34
Page 142
00E - 02 5 . 00E - 03 0 . 00E + 00 0 - HIPAN 9 RAOS 20 80 100 40 60 Heading (
degrees ) Fem 108 For 10 % Figure 9 Results for Rigid SBU Heave Motion (
Lumped Mass ) Figure 12 Beam User - Elements for One SBU Single SBU Pitch
3 .
00E - 02 5 . 00E - 03 0 . 00E + 00 0 - HIPAN 9 RAOS 20 80 100 40 60 Heading (
degrees ) Fem 108 For 10 % Figure 9 Results for Rigid SBU Heave Motion (
Lumped Mass ) Figure 12 Beam User - Elements for One SBU Single SBU Pitch
3 .
Page 143
00E + 00 20 80 100 40 60 Heading ( degrees ) Element 1046 Figure 16 Results
for Rigid SBU Surge Motion ( Beam ) Figure 14 Wetted Surfaces Associated with
Beam UserElements 1053 and 1046 RMS ( m ) Single SBU Heave 4 . 00E - 02 ...
00E + 00 20 80 100 40 60 Heading ( degrees ) Element 1046 Figure 16 Results
for Rigid SBU Surge Motion ( Beam ) Figure 14 Wetted Surfaces Associated with
Beam UserElements 1053 and 1046 RMS ( m ) Single SBU Heave 4 . 00E - 02 ...
Page 163
It should be noted that the first 6 modes are rigid body surge , sway , heave , roll ,
pitch and yaw , and the deformational modes are modes 7 and above . The
formulation of all quantities in Eq . ( 1 ) is fairly wellknown , except perhaps for
that ...
It should be noted that the first 6 modes are rigid body surge , sway , heave , roll ,
pitch and yaw , and the deformational modes are modes 7 and above . The
formulation of all quantities in Eq . ( 1 ) is fairly wellknown , except perhaps for
that ...
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Contents
OMAE2001OSU5019 | 93 |
OMAE2001OSU5021 | 101 |
A Ship Maneuvering Control Framework | 111 |
Copyright | |
30 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
amplitude analysis angle applied assumed basin beach bending body bottom breakwater bridge calculated changes characteristics coefficient compared components concept Conference considered construction deformation depth developed direction displacement distribution dynamic effects elastic element Engineering equation evaluate experiment experimental field Figure floating structure flow force frequency function girder hindcast horizontal hydrodynamic hydroelastic International Japan layer length linear load marine mass mean measured Mega-Float method mode modules mooring motion numerical observed obtained ocean offshore operation performance plate predicted present pressure problem Proceedings reduce region regular waves Research respectively response rigid ship shoreline shown shows side significant simulation spectrum storm submerged plate surface Table turbine University vertical displacements VLFS wave energy wave height wave period wind