Proceedings of the ... International Conference on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering, Volume 5American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 2001 - Arctic regions |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 68
Page 40
Especially , wave energy absorbing devices on the weather side are very effective to reduce hydroelastic response , but those of lee side are not so effective in comparison with their number . So In this study , L - shaped arrangement ...
Especially , wave energy absorbing devices on the weather side are very effective to reduce hydroelastic response , but those of lee side are not so effective in comparison with their number . So In this study , L - shaped arrangement ...
Page 333
... ( Weather Side ) VLFS ( Center ) A - VLFS ( Lee Side ) Wave Without VLFS ( Weather side ) X Wave Without VLFS ( Lee side ) © Wave With VLFS ( Weather side ) + Wave With VLFS ( Lee side ) Vertical displacement ( cm ) r ME 0.30 2.0 1.0 ...
... ( Weather Side ) VLFS ( Center ) A - VLFS ( Lee Side ) Wave Without VLFS ( Weather side ) X Wave Without VLFS ( Lee side ) © Wave With VLFS ( Weather side ) + Wave With VLFS ( Lee side ) Vertical displacement ( cm ) r ME 0.30 2.0 1.0 ...
Page 334
100 ( 1 ) Vertical displacement ( Point L16 ) VLFS ( Weather Side ) VLFS ( Center ) AVLFS ( Lee Side ) © Wave Without VLFS ( Weather side ) X Wave Without VLFS ( Lee side ) o Wave With VLFS ( Weather side ) + Wave With VLFS ( Lee side ) ...
100 ( 1 ) Vertical displacement ( Point L16 ) VLFS ( Weather Side ) VLFS ( Center ) AVLFS ( Lee Side ) © Wave Without VLFS ( Weather side ) X Wave Without VLFS ( Lee side ) o Wave With VLFS ( Weather side ) + Wave With VLFS ( Lee side ) ...
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Contents
OMAE2001OSU5019 | 93 |
OMAE2001OSU5021 | 101 |
OMAE2001OSU5022 | 111 |
Copyright | |
32 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
amplitude analysis angle applied arrangement assumed beam bending body bottom breakwater bridge calculated chamber coefficient compared components concept Conference considered construction deformation depth described developed device direction displacement distribution dynamic effect elastic element Engineering equation evaluate experiment experimental field Figure floating structure flow force frequency function girder horizontal hydrodynamic hydroelastic increase International irregular waves Japan layer length linear load maneuvers mass mean measured Mega-Float method mode modules mooring motion observed obtained ocean Offshore operation performance position predicted present pressure problem Proceedings ratio reduce reef region Research respectively response rigid scale ship shown shows side significant simulation spectrum submerged plate surface Table Tokyo turbine University vertical VLFS wave energy wave height wave period wind