Proceedings of the ... International Conference on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering, Volume 5American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 2001 - Arctic regions |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 74
Page 335
a Figures 12 ( 1 ) - ( 3 ) show the distribution of significant amplitude of vertical displacement Z3 and significant wave height His inside a reef in regular wave . Wave angles are 45 , 90 , 135 degrees , respectively .
a Figures 12 ( 1 ) - ( 3 ) show the distribution of significant amplitude of vertical displacement Z3 and significant wave height His inside a reef in regular wave . Wave angles are 45 , 90 , 135 degrees , respectively .
Page 337
NOMENCLATURE L : Length ( m ) B : Breadth ( m ) D : Depth ( m ) d : Drauft ( m ) h : Water depth ( m ) f : Frequency ( Hz ) H 13 : Significant wave height ( m ) H : Significant wave height of offshore waves ( m ) H * : Wave height of ...
NOMENCLATURE L : Length ( m ) B : Breadth ( m ) D : Depth ( m ) d : Drauft ( m ) h : Water depth ( m ) f : Frequency ( Hz ) H 13 : Significant wave height ( m ) H : Significant wave height of offshore waves ( m ) H * : Wave height of ...
Page 358
Fig.5 shows the total probability distribution of significant wave height and wave period measured at the east end of the model . The highest significant wave height in the experiment was H1 / 3 = 1.15m . The accuracy of COMEINS wave ...
Fig.5 shows the total probability distribution of significant wave height and wave period measured at the east end of the model . The highest significant wave height in the experiment was H1 / 3 = 1.15m . The accuracy of COMEINS wave ...
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Contents
OMAE2001OSU5019 | 93 |
OMAE2001OSU5021 | 101 |
OMAE2001OSU5022 | 111 |
Copyright | |
32 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
amplitude analysis angle applied arrangement assumed beam bending body bottom breakwater bridge calculated chamber coefficient compared components concept Conference considered construction deformation depth described developed device direction displacement distribution dynamic effect elastic element Engineering equation evaluate experiment experimental field Figure floating structure flow force frequency function girder horizontal hydrodynamic hydroelastic increase International irregular waves Japan layer length linear load maneuvers mass mean measured Mega-Float method mode modules mooring motion observed obtained ocean Offshore operation performance position predicted present pressure problem Proceedings ratio reduce reef region Research respectively response rigid scale ship shown shows side significant simulation spectrum submerged plate surface Table Tokyo turbine University vertical VLFS wave energy wave height wave period wind