Proceedings of the ... International Conference on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering, Volume 5American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 2001 - Arctic regions |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 82
Page 40
So , when wave period of 14s is targeted , depth of barrier plate is about 30m . But wave drifting force increases by blocking wave , especially in the case of short period wave . So , targeted wave period is set as 8s , the highest ...
So , when wave period of 14s is targeted , depth of barrier plate is about 30m . But wave drifting force increases by blocking wave , especially in the case of short period wave . So , targeted wave period is set as 8s , the highest ...
Page 83
12 Transmission coefficient and mean wave period Proceedings ... Furthermore , it is clear that the mean periods of the transmission waves become shorter than the ones of the incident waves as shown in right hand side of Fig . 12.
12 Transmission coefficient and mean wave period Proceedings ... Furthermore , it is clear that the mean periods of the transmission waves become shorter than the ones of the incident waves as shown in right hand side of Fig . 12.
Page 265
0 3 11 12 13 7 8 9 10 Wave period T ( sec ) 0.30 W.D = 108 ° , Deep water 0.25 0.20 Lateral acceleration all ( g / m ) 0.15 0.10 0.05 0 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 4.3.1 Bridge girder displacement Calculated and measured results of bridge ...
0 3 11 12 13 7 8 9 10 Wave period T ( sec ) 0.30 W.D = 108 ° , Deep water 0.25 0.20 Lateral acceleration all ( g / m ) 0.15 0.10 0.05 0 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 4.3.1 Bridge girder displacement Calculated and measured results of bridge ...
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Contents
OMAE2001OSU5019 | 93 |
OMAE2001OSU5021 | 101 |
OMAE2001OSU5022 | 111 |
Copyright | |
32 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
amplitude analysis angle applied arrangement assumed beam bending body bottom breakwater bridge calculated chamber coefficient compared components concept Conference considered construction deformation depth described developed device direction displacement distribution dynamic effect elastic element Engineering equation evaluate experiment experimental field Figure floating structure flow force frequency function girder horizontal hydrodynamic hydroelastic increase International irregular waves Japan layer length linear load maneuvers mass mean measured Mega-Float method mode modules mooring motion observed obtained ocean Offshore operation performance position predicted present pressure problem Proceedings ratio reduce reef region Research respectively response rigid scale ship shown shows side significant simulation spectrum submerged plate surface Table Tokyo turbine University vertical VLFS wave energy wave height wave period wind