Neutron Scattering Data Analysis 1990, Proceedings of the Conference on Neutron Scattering, 14-16 March 1990, Rutherford Appleton Laboratory, UKM. W. Johnson |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 50
Page 104
... corresponding area is equal to M times that of the projected unit cell , which is equal to S. The two related ... corresponds to the center of pixel j . · • + Data = Apparatus Image + noise · · In the simpler case when all the sought 104 ...
... corresponding area is equal to M times that of the projected unit cell , which is equal to S. The two related ... corresponds to the center of pixel j . · • + Data = Apparatus Image + noise · · In the simpler case when all the sought 104 ...
Page 105
... corresponding to better statistics . This is due to the fact that Fm ( K ) ' s corresponding to symmetry related ' s are essentially the same within a known phase factor . In the centrosymmetrical case considered here , this phase ...
... corresponding to better statistics . This is due to the fact that Fm ( K ) ' s corresponding to symmetry related ' s are essentially the same within a known phase factor . In the centrosymmetrical case considered here , this phase ...
Page 258
... corresponding requirements in the repositioning part of the scan , is then totally determined by the two analytical functions eq . ( 1 ) and eq . ( 6 ) , or , more convenient for modern electronics , written as numerical arrays for ( t ) ...
... corresponding requirements in the repositioning part of the scan , is then totally determined by the two analytical functions eq . ( 1 ) and eq . ( 6 ) , or , more convenient for modern electronics , written as numerical arrays for ( t ) ...
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
additional algorithm allows analysis angle applications approach atoms average beam Bragg calculated cell combinatorial optimization configuration constant coordinates correction corresponding cost counts cross-section crystal deconvolution defined density dependent described detector determined diffraction direct display distribution effects elastic scattering energy error estimate example experiment experimental Figure final Fourier function give given inelastic intensity ISIS known limit magnetic Maximum Entropy measured method neutron neutron scattering normalization obtained optimization parameters particular peak performed Phys physical plot positive possible powder presented prior probability problem procedure radial distribution functions range reconstruction References refinement reflections resolution sample scale scan shown shows simulated annealing single solution space spectrum standard statistical structure factor temperature transfer transform unit usually vanadium vector wavelength