Acceptable Premises: An Epistemic Approach to an Informal Logic Problem

Front Cover
Cambridge University Press, Dec 20, 2004 - Philosophy - 401 pages
When, if ever, is one justified in accepting the premises of an argument? What is the proper criterion of premise acceptability? Can the criterion be theoretically or philosophically justified? This is the first book to provide a comprehensive theory of premise acceptability and it answers the questions above from an epistemological approach that the author calls common sense foundationalism. It will be eagerly sought out not just by specialists in informal logic, critical thinking, and argumentation theory but also by a broader range of philosophers and those teaching rhetoric.
 

Contents

Why Do We Need a Theory of Acceptability?
3
Acceptability and Presumption
21
Basic Considerations
38
Acceptability
73
What Types of Statements Are There?
93
Necessary Statements and A Priori Intuition
114
Descriptions and Their BeliefGenerating Mechanisms
124
Interpretations and Their Modes of Intuition
143
Evaluations and the Moral Faculties
218
The Interpersonal BeliefGenerating
281
An Outline of the Practice of Epistemic Casuistry
319
A Commonsense
367
Notes
379
References
389
Index
395
Copyright

Other editions - View all

Common terms and phrases

Popular passages

Page 6 - I think it may not be amiss to take notice, that, however faith be opposed to reason, faith is nothing but a firm assent of the mind ; which, if it be regulated, as is our duty, cannot be afforded to anything but upon good reason, and so cannot be opposite to it.

About the author (2004)

James B. Freeman is Professor of Philosophy at Hunter College of The City University of New York.

Bibliographic information