Symmons (1806). Fletcher (1833), Mitford (1851), and St John (Bohn, 4 vols. 1848-53). Macaulay's criticism in the Essays is characteristically brilliant. In 1690-94 Hog (Hogæus) rendered most of Milton's poems into Latin; and there are Latin versions of Paradise Lost by Joseph Trapp (1741) and William Dobson (1750). The English translation of the first Defensio usually cited is that by Joseph Washington (about 1690); of the second, that by Dr Fellowes (1806); and there is another by Archdeacon Wrangham (1816). G. Jenny has written an interesting book (1890) on the influence of Milton on German literature in the eighteenth century. The portrait given on page 687, less familiar than those from the engravings by Faithorne, is from the painting by the Dutch painter Van der Plaas (1647-1704), now in the National Portrait Gallery. Andrew Marvell was born in the village of Winestead, in the south-east angle of Yorkshire, on 31st March 1621. His father, also Andrew Marvell (c. 1586-1641), was rector of Winestead, which living he resigned in 1624 for the mastership of Hull grammar-school. A romantic story is told of the circumstances attending the elder Marvell's death. A young lady from the opposite side of the Humber had visited him on the occasion of the baptism of one of his children. She was to return next day, and though the weather proved tempestuous, insisted on fulfilling the promise she had made to her mother. Mr Marvell accompanied her; but having a presentiment of danger, he threw his cane ashore from the boat, saying to the spectators that in case he should perish the cane was to be given to his son, with the injunction that he should remember his father. His fears were but too truly verified; the boat went down in the storm, and the party perished. The mother of the young lady, it is added, provided for the orphan son of the drowned minister, and at her death left him her fortune. Young Marvell studied in 1633-41 at Trinity College, Cambridge, and then travelled for four years in Holland, France, Italy, and Spain. A letter from Milton to Secretary Bradshaw was in 1823 discovered in the State-Paper Office, in which the poet recommends Marvell as a person well fitted to assist himself in his office of Latin secretary, he being a good scholar and lately engaged by Lord Fairfax to give some instruction in the languages to his daughter. The letter is dated 21st February 1653. Marvell, however, was not engaged as Milton's assistant till 1657; meanwhile he was tutor at Eton to a ward of Cromwell's, and there got to know John Hales. In January 1659 he took his seat in Richard Cromwell's Parliament as member for Hull. He was not, like Waller, an eloquent speaker, but his consistency and integrity made him highly esteemed and respected. He maintained a close correspondence with his constituents, and his letters fill four hundred printed pages. His constituents, in return, occasionally sent him a stout cask of ale; and he was one of the last paid members, receiving in session 6s. 8d. per diem. In 1663-65 he went as a secretary of embassy to Russia, Sweden, and Denmark. Charles II. delighted in his society, and believing, like Sir Robert Walpole, that every man had his price, he sent Lord Danby, his treasurer, to wait upon Marvell, with an offer of a place at court and an immediate present of a thousand pounds. The inflexible member resisted his offers, and it is said humorously illustrated his independence by calling his servant to witness that he had dined for three days successively on a shoulder of mutton. The story adds-but the whole seems highly improbable -that when the treasurer was gone Marvell was forced to send to a friend to borrow a guinea. The patriot preserved his integrity to the last, and satirised the profligacy and arbitrary measures of the court with much wit and pungency. He died 18th August 1678, at the time of the Popish Plot, not without suspicion of poison, but really the victim of a tertian ague, unskilfully treated by an ignorant, obstinate doctor. The town of Hull voted £50 to erect a monument to Marvell's memory, but the court interfered and forbade the votive tribute. Marvell's prose writings were exceedingly popular in their day, but, written for temporary purposes, they have mostly gone out of date with the events that produced them. In 1672-73 he attacked Dr (afterwards Bishop) Parker in a piece entitled The Rehearsal Transprosed, in which he vindicates the fair fame of Milton, who, he says, 'was and is a man of as great learning and sharpness of wit as any man.' This controversy has won him a part as interlocutor in one of the most vigorous of Landor's Imaginary Conversations, where he is made to slay the Bishop over again, and to say far finer things about Milton than he had said in his own works. One of Marvell's treatises, An Account of the Growth of Popery and Arbitrary Government in England (1677), was considered so formidable that a reward was offered for the dis A covery of the author and printer. As in the case of Milton and other Puritans, the energy and independence of Marvell in theological controversy verged upon freethinking and rationalism. Short Historical Essay concerning General Councils, appended to one of his controversial tracts, is so free in its criticism of the mode of securing agreement at the Council of Nice that it looks very like a polemic against the dogmas there formulated and so forced on the Christian Church. And one is not surprised to find that this essay was republished in the interests of the eighteenth-century Deists. Ample evidence of that vein of sportive humour and raillery on national manners and absurdities, afterwards so effectively employed by Addison, Steele, Arbuthnot, and Swift, may be found in Marvell. He wrote with great liveliness, point, and vigour, though he was often coarse and personal. His poetry was, in his own time, an embellishment to his character of patriot and controversialist rather than a substantive ground of honour and distinction; yet even Sainte- Beuve (whose attention was called to him by Matthew Arnold) greeted in him a worthy though not co-equal rival of Milton, a more martial and less purely Christian champion of the same Christian and patriotic English renaissance. Only a lovable man could have written his verses on The Emigrants in the Bermudas. His poem on The Nymph Complaining for the Death of her Fawn is a triumph of grace and pathos. 'Music the mosaic of the air,' from his Music's Empire, illustrates a tendency to occasional conceits; 'Only human eyes can weep,' from Eyes and Tears, shows suggestive (if not strictly accurate) observation and phrasing. A different aspect of his genius, recalling the frank and half-pagan sensuousness of another party and an earlier age than his own, is seen in the lines To his Coy Mistress, and in those entitled The Garden. The former, perhaps his very finest verses, are too much like some of Donne's warmer amoretti for quotation in full; yet this specimen of them must at least be quoted : But at my back I always hear Time's winged chariot hurrying near, Deserts of vast eternity. The luscious stanzas on The Garden-a superior English rendering of a Latin exercise of Marvell's own-are not extravagantly praised by Palgrave as ' a test of any reader's insight into the most poetical aspects of poetry,' although the affinity which they display is not so much with Shelley's airy raptures as with the luxuriant fancies of Keats. The Emigrants in the Bermudas. Unto an isle so long unknowa, From Lebanon he stores the land; The Nymph Complaining for the Death of her Fawn. The wanton troopers riding by Have shot my fawn, and it will die. Keeps register of every thing, Inconstant Sylvio, when yet I had not found him counterfeit, One morning, I remember well, Tied in this silver chain and bell, Gave it to me: nay, and I know What he said then, I'm sure I do. Said he 'Look how your huntsman here Thenceforth I set myself to play With sweetest milk and sugar first It waxed more white and sweet than they. I blushed to see its foot more soft, And white, shall I say than my hand? It was a wondrous thing how fleet I have a garden of my own, And all the spring-time of the year Have sought it oft, where it should lie; It like a bank of lilies laid. Had it lived long, it would have been O help! O help! I see it faint See how it weeps! The tears do come Melt in such amber tears as these. From A Poem upon the Death of His Late Highness, the Lord Protector.' He without noise still travelled to his end, As silent suns to meet the night descend; He marched, and through deep Severn, ending war: In their own griefs might find themselves employed, I saw him dead: a leaden slumber lies, The Character of Holland. [A satire on Holland as supporting the cause of the pretender Charles II., then an exile there.] ; Holland, that scarce deserves the name of land, Glad then, as miners who have found the ore, Or than those pills which sordid beetles roll, Hence some small dike-grave unperceived invades 5 'Tis probable religion, after this, Came next in order; which they could not miss. 1 A game otherwise called 'hitch-buttock.' 2 Kabeljauw is Dutch for 'cod-fish.' 3 Heeren is Dutch for men,' 'gentlemen.' Earl of a dike. 5 A pun on Hollanders, as Whole-anders. A Horatian Ode upon Cromwell's Return from Ireland. The forward youth that would appear, Nor in the shadows sing His numbers languishing : 'Tis time to leave the books in dust, And oil the unused armour's rust, Removing from the wall The corselet of the hall. So restless Cromwell could not cease But through adventurous war And, like the three-forked lightning, first Did thorough his own side And with such to inclose Is more than to oppose ;) Then burning through the air he went, And palaces and temples rent; And Cæsar's head at last Did through his laurels blast. To plant the bergamot, As men are strong or weak), And therefore must make room What field of all the civil war, Where, twining subtile fears with hope, That Charles himself might chase To Carisbrook's narrow case, That thence the royal actor borne, The tragic scaffold might adorn, While round the armed bands, Did clap their bloody hands : He nothing common did or mean Upon that memorable scene, But with his keener eye The axe's edge did try ; But bowed his comely head This was that memorable hour, A bleeding head, where they begun, And yet in that the state And now the Irish are ashamed Nor yet grown stiffer with command, But still in the republic's hand, (How fit he is to sway, That can so well obey!) He to the Commons' feet presents A kingdom for his first year's rents; And, what he may, forbears His fame, to make it theirs ; And has his sword and spoils ungirt, To lay them at the public's skirt : So when the falcon high Falls heavy from the sky, She, having killed, no more doth search, What may not others fear, And to all states not free, The Pict no shelter now shall find But from this valour sad, Nor lay his hounds in near But thou, the war's and fortune's son And for the last effect, The same arts that did gain Marvell's Poems were printed in folio in 1681 with a preface by his widow, and again by Cooke in 1726. Captain E. Thompson edited his Works (3 vols. 1776); but the only complete and accurate edition is that of Dr A. B. Grosart (4 vols. 1872-74). There is an admirable selection by G. A. Aitken (1892). Algernon Sidney (1622-82), son of the Earl of Leicester, was carefully educated, accompanied his father to Denmark and France, and when his father was Lord Deputy of Ireland, commanded a troop of horse against the Irish rebels. In 1643, during the Civil War, Sidney was permitted to return to England, where he immediately joined the parliamentary forces, and, as colonel of a regiment of horse, was present at several engagements. He was likewise successively governor of Chichester, Dublin, and Dover. In 1648 he was named a member of the court for trying the king, which, however, he did not attend, though not from any disapproval of the intentions of those who composed it. The usurpation of Cromwell gave offence to Sidney, who declined to accept office either under the Protector or his son Richard; but when the Long Parliament recovered power, he readily consented to act as one of the Council of State. At the time of the Restoration he was engaged on an embassy to Denmark and Sweden; and, apprehensive of the vengeance of the royalists, he remained abroad for seventeen years, flitting from place to place -Venice, Rome, Brussels, Augsburg. After his return to England by the king's permission in 1677, he opposed the measures of the court, a course which Hume and others held to be ungrateful to the king. A more serious charge was first presented in Dalrymple's Memoirs of Great Britain, published in 1773. The English patriots, with Lord William Russell at their head, intrigued with Barillon, the French ambassador, to prevent war between France and England, their purpose being to preclude Charles II. from having the command of the large funds which on such an occasion must have been entrusted to him, and which he might have used against the liberties of the nation; while Louis was not less anxious to prevent the English from joining the list of his enemies. The association was a strange one; but it never would have been held as a moral stain upon the patriots if Sir John Dalrymple had not discovered amongst Barillon's papers one containing a list of persons receiving bribes from the French monarch, amongst whom appears the name of Sidney, together with those of several other leading Whig members of Parliament. Lord Russell was not of the number, but that Sidney stooped to receive the money is admitted by Hallam, Macaulay, and Firth (though disputed by Ewald)-doubtless for public and not personal But it is evident, as Lord Macaulay argued, that national feeling in England was at a low ebb when Charles II. was willing to become the deputy of France, and a man like Algernon Sidney would have been content to see England reduced to the condition of a French province in the wild hope that a foreign despot would assist him to establish his darling republic. It should be remembered that Sidney was as openly hostile to William of Orange as to Charles. He took a conspicuous part in the proceedings by which the Whigs endeavoured to exclude the Duke of York from the throne; and when that attempt failed, he seems to have joined in the conspiracy for an insurrection to accomplish the same object. This was exposed in consequence of the detection of an inferior plot for the assassination of the king, in which the patriots Russell, Sidney, and others were dexterously inculpated by the court. Sidney was tried for high treason before the infamous Chief-Justice Jeffreys. Although the only witness against him was an abandoned character, Lord Howard, and nothing could be produced that even ostensibly strengthened the evidence, except some manuscripts in which the lawfulness of resisting tyrants was asserted, the right of deposing kings maintained, and a preference given to a free over an arbitrary government, the jury were servile enough to obey the directions of the judge and pronounce him guilty. Sidney was uses. |