Interpreting Folklore..". Dundes has produced a work which will be useful to both students and teachers who wish to broaden their understanding of modern folklore." -- Center for Southern Folklore Magazine "It is impossible ever to remain unimpressed with [Dundes'] excursuses, however much one may be in disagreement (or not) with his conclusions." -- Forum for Modern Language Studies Often controversial, Alan Dundes's scholarship is always provocative, perceptive, and intelligent. His concern here is to assess the material folklorists have so painstakingly amassed and classified, to interpret folklore, and to use folklore to increase our understanding of human nature and culture. |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 66
Page 161
With the possible exception of " ladies and gentlemen , " most of the traditional verbal formulas consistently place males before females , e.g. , king and queen ( never queen and king ) ; lord and lady ; Mr. and Mrs .; his and hers ...
With the possible exception of " ladies and gentlemen , " most of the traditional verbal formulas consistently place males before females , e.g. , king and queen ( never queen and king ) ; lord and lady ; Mr. and Mrs .; his and hers ...
Page 172
Females who act like males are dangerous —crowing hens and broom - riding witches . But males who act like females are not dangerous at all . This peculiar form of male chauvinism may not be so obvious and , in fact , the suggestion ...
Females who act like males are dangerous —crowing hens and broom - riding witches . But males who act like females are not dangerous at all . This peculiar form of male chauvinism may not be so obvious and , in fact , the suggestion ...
Page 174
If anyone doubts that Santa Claus and the stork are male chauvinistic images , what about the Easter bunny ? Again as in the case of the stork , the sex of the Easter bunny is not always explicitly stated . Yet informants claim that ...
If anyone doubts that Santa Claus and the stork are male chauvinistic images , what about the Easter bunny ? Again as in the case of the stork , the sex of the Easter bunny is not always explicitly stated . Yet informants claim that ...
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Contents
The Curious Case of the Widemouth Frog | 62 |
A Folkloristic Reflection of | 69 |
Seeing Is Believing | 86 |
Copyright | |
5 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
American analysis animal appear asked attempt baby become belief believe birth boys bullroarer called castration child collected common concerned considered consists context culture daughter discussion distinction essay evidence evil eye example existence explain expression fact father female folk folklore folkloristic folktale football frog future girl given hand hero pattern idea important individual initiation interest interpretation Italy Jesus joke King Lear legend linguistic liquid literal male Mary means metaphor milk mother myth nature noted object one's original parents particular past perhaps person phallic play possible present Press projection proverb question reason refer reported represent ritual sense sexual similar society speaking story structure suggests symbolic tale theory tion traditional United University wish woman women worldview York young
References to this book
Bibliographic information
| Title | Interpreting Folklore |
| Author | Alan Dundes |
| Edition | 2, illustrated, reprint |
| Publisher | Indiana University Press, 1980 |
| Original from | the University of California |
| Digitized | 22 Jul 2008 |
| ISBN | 0253143071, 9780253143075 |
| Length | 304 pages |
| Subjects | › Social Science / Folklore & Mythology |
| Export Citation | BiBTeX EndNote RefMan |