Proceedings of the Idaho State Bar, Volume 10Capital News Publishing Company, 1934 - Bar associations Vols. 11 (1935)- include Proceedings of the Judicial Section, v. 1- |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 86
Page 26
Idaho State Bar. of the Bar associations in states like California and New York are not applicable to us . They have over 15,000 lawyers in California . We have about 550 in the state of Idaho . If you are going to require 75 % of the ...
Idaho State Bar. of the Bar associations in states like California and New York are not applicable to us . They have over 15,000 lawyers in California . We have about 550 in the state of Idaho . If you are going to require 75 % of the ...
Page 83
Idaho State Bar. be heard by the court after such notice to the adverse parties , as the court shall direct ; and an order granting or rejecting the application made , and if rejected , the court shall state the reasons therefor . " No ...
Idaho State Bar. be heard by the court after such notice to the adverse parties , as the court shall direct ; and an order granting or rejecting the application made , and if rejected , the court shall state the reasons therefor . " No ...
Page 93
Idaho State Bar. entered . The attorney filed a petition in the supreme court asking that the proceedings of the commissioners be reviewed and that the same be disapproved . In the resulting decision by the Supreme Court the Bar Act was ...
Idaho State Bar. entered . The attorney filed a petition in the supreme court asking that the proceedings of the commissioners be reviewed and that the same be disapproved . In the resulting decision by the Supreme Court the Bar Act was ...
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
action adopted amendment annual appeal applicants appointed argument attend attorney authority Bank Bar Association believe Board Boise brief calendar cause charge Commission committee companies consider consideration Constitution counsel course crime criminal defendant discussion District Division duty effect election examination fact favor Federal filed five give given going GRAHAM hearing Idaho Idaho State Bar instructions interest JUDGE JUDGE KOELSCH judgment judicial jury JUSTICE lawyers legislative legislature matter meeting MORGAN motion move necessary notice objection opinion pardon party pass person practice prepared present President procedure proceedings profession proposed question reason recommendations record referred resolution respect result rules serve statute submitted suggested Supreme Court taken term thing tion trial unless