Proceedings of the Idaho State Bar, Volume 10Vols. 11 (1935)- include Proceedings of the Judicial Section, v. 1- |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 71
Page 27
Oral argument often eliminates a lot of useless questions . I like to hear the argument , and I liked to argue my cases . I had the satisfaction of having unloaded on the Court my voice on the questions , and my clients at least felt ...
Oral argument often eliminates a lot of useless questions . I like to hear the argument , and I liked to argue my cases . I had the satisfaction of having unloaded on the Court my voice on the questions , and my clients at least felt ...
Page 8
briefs prior to oral argument . What is your pleasure on that question ? MR . BOUGHTON : As I recall , Mr. Chairman , that particular question was injected into the meeting by one of the members of the Supreme Court himself at the last ...
briefs prior to oral argument . What is your pleasure on that question ? MR . BOUGHTON : As I recall , Mr. Chairman , that particular question was injected into the meeting by one of the members of the Supreme Court himself at the last ...
Page 9
dered a rehearing and limited both brief and argument . Upon certain matters of theory they didn't allow us a rehearing . However , I am going to vote in favor of it - whatever the section does . MR . EVANS : All those in favor of the ...
dered a rehearing and limited both brief and argument . Upon certain matters of theory they didn't allow us a rehearing . However , I am going to vote in favor of it - whatever the section does . MR . EVANS : All those in favor of the ...
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
action adopted amendment annual appeal applicants appointed argument attention attorney authority Bank Bar Association believe Board Boise brief calendar cause charge Commission committee companies consider consideration Constitution counsel course crime criminal defendant discussion District Division duty effect election examination fact favor Federal filed five give given going GRAHAM hearing Idaho Idaho State Bar instructions interest JUDGE JUDGE KOELSCH judgment judicial jury JUSTICE lawyers legislative legislature matter meeting MORGAN motion move necessary notice objection opinion pardon party pass person practice prepared present President procedure proceedings profession proposed question reason recommendations record referred resolution respect result rules serve statute submitted suggested Supreme Court taken term thing tion trial unless