Proceedings of the Idaho State Bar, Volume 10Vols. 11 (1935)- include Proceedings of the Judicial Section, v. 1- |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 57
Page 33
From the Territorial rules of 1870 , until 1926 the time within which appellants ' brief had to be filed varied from , at least one day before the argument to , by the rules of 1919 as amended in 1926 , 20 days for ...
From the Territorial rules of 1870 , until 1926 the time within which appellants ' brief had to be filed varied from , at least one day before the argument to , by the rules of 1919 as amended in 1926 , 20 days for ...
Page 34
For a long period of our existence as a Territory and State the time for preparation of briefs was much shorter than now ... Oregon allows 20 days for appellants ' brief , 20 days for the respondents ' , and 10 days for a reply brief .
For a long period of our existence as a Territory and State the time for preparation of briefs was much shorter than now ... Oregon allows 20 days for appellants ' brief , 20 days for the respondents ' , and 10 days for a reply brief .
Page 32
I doubt very much whether he would be confined to that , because he files that brief within five days and then the Court looks it over and possibly there is something in that and he wants argument , and on that day he can argue it on ...
I doubt very much whether he would be confined to that , because he files that brief within five days and then the Court looks it over and possibly there is something in that and he wants argument , and on that day he can argue it on ...
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
action adopted amendment annual appeal applicants appointed argument attention attorney authority Bank Bar Association believe Board Boise brief calendar cause charge Commission committee companies consider consideration Constitution counsel course crime criminal defendant discussion District Division duty effect election examination fact favor Federal filed five give given going GRAHAM hearing Idaho Idaho State Bar instructions interest JUDGE JUDGE KOELSCH judgment judicial jury JUSTICE lawyers legislative legislature matter meeting MORGAN motion move necessary notice objection opinion pardon party pass person practice prepared present President procedure proceedings profession proposed question reason recommendations record referred resolution respect result rules serve statute submitted suggested Supreme Court taken term thing tion trial unless