Proceedings of the Idaho State Bar, Volume 10Capital News Publishing Company, 1934 - Bar associations Vols. 11 (1935)- include Proceedings of the Judicial Section, v. 1- |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 52
Page 33
... brief . In 1928 this time was changed to 40 days for appellant ; 30 for respondent ; and 20 for reply brief , and frequently extensions of time have been given for the preparation of briefs for both parties , sometimes based upon a ...
... brief . In 1928 this time was changed to 40 days for appellant ; 30 for respondent ; and 20 for reply brief , and frequently extensions of time have been given for the preparation of briefs for both parties , sometimes based upon a ...
Page 34
... briefs for both appellant and respondent to 30 days and 10 days for reply brief . Oregon allows 20 days for appellants ' brief , 20 days for the respondents ' , and 10 days for a reply brief . In 1928 when the period was extended as ...
... briefs for both appellant and respondent to 30 days and 10 days for reply brief . Oregon allows 20 days for appellants ' brief , 20 days for the respondents ' , and 10 days for a reply brief . In 1928 when the period was extended as ...
Page 32
... brief in five days ? I have a case now that is going to present an intricate phase of law ; if I have to submit a brief in five days , I cannot do it . Lots of times after a person has filed a general demurrer some point of law occurs ...
... brief in five days ? I have a case now that is going to present an intricate phase of law ; if I have to submit a brief in five days , I cannot do it . Lots of times after a person has filed a general demurrer some point of law occurs ...
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
action adopted amendment annual appeal applicants appointed argument attend attorney authority Bank Bar Association believe Board Boise brief calendar cause charge Commission committee companies consider consideration Constitution counsel course crime criminal defendant discussion District Division duty effect election examination fact favor Federal filed five give given going GRAHAM hearing Idaho Idaho State Bar instructions interest JUDGE JUDGE KOELSCH judgment judicial jury JUSTICE lawyers legislative legislature matter meeting MORGAN motion move necessary notice objection opinion pardon party pass person practice prepared present President procedure proceedings profession proposed question reason recommendations record referred resolution respect result rules serve statute submitted suggested Supreme Court taken term thing tion trial unless