Proceedings of the Idaho State Bar, Volume 10Vols. 11 (1935)- include Proceedings of the Judicial Section, v. 1- |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 82
Page 120
That may be seriously questioned , for title companies are not going to unduly incur contingent liabilities . Assume it to be true that title insurance would reduce both general abstract examination and general Court work .
That may be seriously questioned , for title companies are not going to unduly incur contingent liabilities . Assume it to be true that title insurance would reduce both general abstract examination and general Court work .
Page 138
Said companies have each set up and maintain their own claims departments for the purpose of adjusting claims against their sureties and said claims departments have in the past settled claims against their sureties and are now ...
Said companies have each set up and maintain their own claims departments for the purpose of adjusting claims against their sureties and said claims departments have in the past settled claims against their sureties and are now ...
Page 139
The Court further finds that the following acts constitute ' law business ' ; and the performance thereof is the practice of law ' ; and the performance of such acts by casualty insurance companies through or by the claims departments ...
The Court further finds that the following acts constitute ' law business ' ; and the performance thereof is the practice of law ' ; and the performance of such acts by casualty insurance companies through or by the claims departments ...
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
action adopted amendment annual appeal applicants appointed argument attention attorney authority Bank Bar Association believe Board Boise brief calendar cause charge Commission committee companies consider consideration Constitution counsel course crime criminal defendant discussion District Division duty effect election examination fact favor Federal filed five give given going GRAHAM hearing Idaho Idaho State Bar instructions interest JUDGE JUDGE KOELSCH judgment judicial jury JUSTICE lawyers legislative legislature matter meeting MORGAN motion move necessary notice objection opinion pardon party pass person practice prepared present President procedure proceedings profession proposed question reason recommendations record referred resolution respect result rules serve statute submitted suggested Supreme Court taken term thing tion trial unless