Proceedings of the Idaho State Bar, Volume 10Vols. 11 (1935)- include Proceedings of the Judicial Section, v. 1- |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 83
Page 7
Six applicants for examination were rejected upon their applications and investigation thereof . Six applicants failed examination , and were therefor rejected . Two applicants passed examination , and were recommended .
Six applicants for examination were rejected upon their applications and investigation thereof . Six applicants failed examination , and were therefor rejected . Two applicants passed examination , and were recommended .
Page 41
being required to submit to examination . But the cost to the Bar of such applicants is commonly greater , due to the Board's policy of making more stringent character investigation of such applicants . It is not unusual in other states ...
being required to submit to examination . But the cost to the Bar of such applicants is commonly greater , due to the Board's policy of making more stringent character investigation of such applicants . It is not unusual in other states ...
Page 67
35 , which provides that in an action in which the mental or physical condition of a party is in controversy , the court may order him to submit to a physical or mental examination by a physician . The order may be made only on motion ...
35 , which provides that in an action in which the mental or physical condition of a party is in controversy , the court may order him to submit to a physical or mental examination by a physician . The order may be made only on motion ...
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
action adopted amendment annual appeal applicants appointed argument attention attorney authority Bank Bar Association believe Board Boise brief calendar cause charge Commission committee companies consider consideration Constitution counsel course crime criminal defendant discussion District Division duty effect election examination fact favor Federal filed five give given going GRAHAM hearing Idaho Idaho State Bar instructions interest JUDGE JUDGE KOELSCH judgment judicial jury JUSTICE lawyers legislative legislature matter meeting MORGAN motion move necessary notice objection opinion pardon party pass person practice prepared present President procedure proceedings profession proposed question reason recommendations record referred resolution respect result rules serve statute submitted suggested Supreme Court taken term thing tion trial unless