Proceedings of the Idaho State Bar, Volume 10Capital News Publishing Company, 1934 - Bar associations Vols. 11 (1935)- include Proceedings of the Judicial Section, v. 1- |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 84
Page 88
... held in June 1920 . The fact that the idea had gained much headway appears from the report of the Committee on State Bar Organization of the Conference of Delegates , headed by Judge Goodwin , submitted at the meeting held at St. Louis ...
... held in June 1920 . The fact that the idea had gained much headway appears from the report of the Committee on State Bar Organization of the Conference of Delegates , headed by Judge Goodwin , submitted at the meeting held at St. Louis ...
Page 91
... held the act unconstitutional , two held it constitutional and one judge ex- pressed no opinion . Final determination of the case came in Septem- ber , 1924 . The Board of Commissioners again met in Boise , November 24th , 1924 , and ...
... held the act unconstitutional , two held it constitutional and one judge ex- pressed no opinion . Final determination of the case came in Septem- ber , 1924 . The Board of Commissioners again met in Boise , November 24th , 1924 , and ...
Page 95
... held that they receive the decisions of the bar and treat them only as advisory . In only one state , Idaho , has the act been held void . And after amendment the act was sustained . The question of validity of the acts has been up and ...
... held that they receive the decisions of the bar and treat them only as advisory . In only one state , Idaho , has the act been held void . And after amendment the act was sustained . The question of validity of the acts has been up and ...
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
action adopted amendment annual appeal applicants appointed argument attend attorney authority Bank Bar Association believe Board Boise brief calendar cause charge Commission committee companies consider consideration Constitution counsel course crime criminal defendant discussion District Division duty effect election examination fact favor Federal filed five give given going GRAHAM hearing Idaho Idaho State Bar instructions interest JUDGE JUDGE KOELSCH judgment judicial jury JUSTICE lawyers legislative legislature matter meeting MORGAN motion move necessary notice objection opinion pardon party pass person practice prepared present President procedure proceedings profession proposed question reason recommendations record referred resolution respect result rules serve statute submitted suggested Supreme Court taken term thing tion trial unless