Connecticut Bar Journal, Volume 67State Bar Association of Connecticut, 1993 - Bar associations Includes Annual reports, and lists of members. |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 75
Page 28
Though sought by one taxpayer to apply to a particular transaction , this section was drafted to apply to all similarly situated taxpayers . Nevertheless , the requirement of post - 1991 acquisition could result in unequal treatment .
Though sought by one taxpayer to apply to a particular transaction , this section was drafted to apply to all similarly situated taxpayers . Nevertheless , the requirement of post - 1991 acquisition could result in unequal treatment .
Page 47
Finally , even if the carve out legislation does not apply to a particular service transaction before July 1 , 1992 , the taxpayer may take the position that the principles enunciated in the AirKaman case require non - taxability for ...
Finally , even if the carve out legislation does not apply to a particular service transaction before July 1 , 1992 , the taxpayer may take the position that the principles enunciated in the AirKaman case require non - taxability for ...
Page 170
Getty had apparently argued that the proper penalty standard to apply was the standard set forth in CONN . Gen. Stat . § 22a - 450 , which set a maximum penalty amount of $ 5,000 . The court agreed with the DEP , however , and held that ...
Getty had apparently argued that the proper penalty standard to apply was the standard set forth in CONN . Gen. Stat . § 22a - 450 , which set a maximum penalty amount of $ 5,000 . The court agreed with the DEP , however , and held that ...
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Contents
Labor Relations and Employment | 39 |
C | 51 |
DEVELOPMENTS IN CONNECTICUT | 55 |
Copyright | |
16 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
abortion action activity admissibility alleged allow amendment antitrust Appellate Court apply attorneys authority basis breach cause challenge charged claim Commission common law Company concerning concluded conduct Conn Connecticut consider constitutional contract corporation counsel crime criminal damages decision defendant defendant's denied determine dissent effect element employees enforcement establish evidence exempt fact faith federal filed granted held important income innocent intent interest involving issue judge jury Justice lawyers legislative liability limited majority matter means merger motion nature opinion original parties permits person plaintiff Practice present prior procedure protection prove provides question reasonable regulations result rule Sess Shakespeare significant Stat statute Super Superior supra note Supreme Court theories tort trial court United violation