Connecticut Bar Journal, Volume 67State Bar Association of Connecticut, 1993 - Bar associations Includes Annual reports, and lists of members. |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 85
Page 160
22 This left the court with the separate issue of whether , under these circumstances , Starr could be held to have maintained the polluted condition at her property in such a manner as to make her liable under $ 22a - 432 .
22 This left the court with the separate issue of whether , under these circumstances , Starr could be held to have maintained the polluted condition at her property in such a manner as to make her liable under $ 22a - 432 .
Page 386
However , an insurer can be held liable for any bad faith actions done by its employees.es 61 59 See , e.g. , Herb v . Fireman's Fund Ins . Co. , 9 Conn . L. Trib . No. 77 at 13 ( Oct. 31 , 1983 ) ( Super . Ct . 1983 ) and Johansen v .
However , an insurer can be held liable for any bad faith actions done by its employees.es 61 59 See , e.g. , Herb v . Fireman's Fund Ins . Co. , 9 Conn . L. Trib . No. 77 at 13 ( Oct. 31 , 1983 ) ( Super . Ct . 1983 ) and Johansen v .
Page 401
In this case , however , [ DEP ] never issued an order to anyone else , so there was no one with whom the plaintiff could be held jointly and severally liable ... By its explicit terms , the statute cannot be employed to confer ...
In this case , however , [ DEP ] never issued an order to anyone else , so there was no one with whom the plaintiff could be held jointly and severally liable ... By its explicit terms , the statute cannot be employed to confer ...
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Contents
Labor Relations and Employment | 39 |
C | 51 |
DEVELOPMENTS IN CONNECTICUT | 55 |
Copyright | |
16 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
abortion action activity admissibility alleged allow amendment antitrust Appellate Court apply attorneys authority basis breach cause challenge charged claim Commission common law Company concerning concluded conduct Conn Connecticut consider constitutional contract corporation counsel crime criminal damages decision defendant defendant's denied determine dissent effect element employees enforcement establish evidence exempt fact faith federal filed granted held important income innocent intent interest involving issue judge jury Justice lawyers legislative liability limited majority matter means merger motion nature opinion original parties permits person plaintiff Practice present prior procedure protection prove provides question reasonable regulations result rule Sess Shakespeare significant Stat statute Super Superior supra note Supreme Court theories tort trial court United violation