Connecticut Bar Journal, Volume 67State Bar Association of Connecticut, 1993 - Bar associations Includes Annual reports, and lists of members. |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 36
Page 355
This analysis supports the proposition that the Act does not abolish the common law theories of liability . This article provides an historical perspective of the law of products liability and compares the Connecticut Products Liability ...
This analysis supports the proposition that the Act does not abolish the common law theories of liability . This article provides an historical perspective of the law of products liability and compares the Connecticut Products Liability ...
Page 361
27 It is clear from the above that the purpose of g 52-572n ( a ) cannot be to abolish the common law theories of liability . " Instead , our Act unites the common law theories in one cause of action within its procedural framework.2 It ...
27 It is clear from the above that the purpose of g 52-572n ( a ) cannot be to abolish the common law theories of liability . " Instead , our Act unites the common law theories in one cause of action within its procedural framework.2 It ...
Page 362
To read the Act as abolishing the common law theories would render $ 52-572m ( b ) inoperative and meaningless . In an attempt to reconcile all parts as far as possible , in construing a statute , each part should be made operative and ...
To read the Act as abolishing the common law theories would render $ 52-572m ( b ) inoperative and meaningless . In an attempt to reconcile all parts as far as possible , in construing a statute , each part should be made operative and ...
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Contents
Labor Relations and Employment | 39 |
C | 51 |
DEVELOPMENTS IN CONNECTICUT | 55 |
Copyright | |
16 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
abortion action activity admissibility alleged allow amendment antitrust Appellate Court apply attorneys authority basis breach cause challenge charged claim Commission common law Company concerning concluded conduct Conn Connecticut consider constitutional contract corporation counsel crime criminal damages decision defendant defendant's denied determine dissent effect element employees enforcement establish evidence exempt fact faith federal filed granted held important income innocent intent interest involving issue judge jury Justice lawyers legislative liability limited majority matter means merger motion nature opinion original parties permits person plaintiff Practice present prior procedure protection prove provides question reasonable regulations result rule Sess Shakespeare significant Stat statute Super Superior supra note Supreme Court theories tort trial court United violation