A Theory of JusticeSince it appeared in 1971, John Rawls's A Theory of Justice has become a classic. The author has now revised the original edition to clear up a number of difficulties he and others have found in the original book. Rawls aims to express an essential part of the common core of the democratic tradition--justice as fairness--and to provide an alternative to utilitarianism, which had dominated the Anglo-Saxon tradition of political thought since the nineteenth century. Rawls substitutes the ideal of the social contract as a more satisfactory account of the basic rights and liberties of citizens as free and equal persons. "Each person," writes Rawls, "possesses an inviolability founded on justice that even the welfare of society as a whole cannot override." Advancing the ideas of Rousseau, Kant, Emerson, and Lincoln, Rawls's theory is as powerful today as it was when first published. |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 87
Page 5
... determining what they take to be the proper distribution of the benefits and burdens of social cooperation . Thus it seems ... determine a proper balance between competing claims to the advantages of social life . Men can agree to this ...
... determining what they take to be the proper distribution of the benefits and burdens of social cooperation . Thus it seems ... determine a proper balance between competing claims to the advantages of social life . Men can agree to this ...
Page 36
... determining the balance of precepts , or at least for confining it within narrower limits . Thus we can consider the ... determine the balance of these ends . For purposes of illustration , let us discuss a rather simple yet familiar ...
... determining the balance of precepts , or at least for confining it within narrower limits . Thus we can consider the ... determine the balance of these ends . For purposes of illustration , let us discuss a rather simple yet familiar ...
Page 92
... determine his best situation . We do not have to know how much he prefers one situation to another . The difference ... determined by what is for him the most rational long - term plan of life given reasonably favorable 92 The Principles ...
... determine his best situation . We do not have to know how much he prefers one situation to another . The difference ... determined by what is for him the most rational long - term plan of life given reasonably favorable 92 The Principles ...
Contents
JUSTICE AS FAIRNESS | 3 |
The Subject of Justice | 7 |
The Main Idea of the Theory of Justice | 11 |
Copyright | |
86 other sections not shown
Common terms and phrases
accept advantages aims apply argument arrangements assume assumptions basic structure ciples circumstances citizens civil disobedience claims conception of justice considered judgments constitution constraints contract doctrine course defined definition desire difference principle discussion distribution economic effective efficiency ends envy equal liberty ethical example expectations express fact favored feelings further greater H. L. A. Hart human idea ideal individuals inequalities initial situation injustice institutions interests interpretation intuitionism intuitive justice as fairness justified least less limits maximize means ments natural duty notion one's original position particular parties philosophical point of view political precepts preferences principle of fairness principle of utility principles of justice problem procedural justice question rational plan reason recognized reflective equilibrium regulated relevant rules scheme seems sense of justice standpoint suppose theory of justice things tion unjust utilitarian veil of ignorance W. G. Runciman well-ordered society