A Theory of JusticeSince it appeared in 1971, John Rawls's A Theory of Justice has become a classic. The author has now revised the original edition to clear up a number of difficulties he and others have found in the original book. Rawls aims to express an essential part of the common core of the democratic tradition--justice as fairness--and to provide an alternative to utilitarianism, which had dominated the Anglo-Saxon tradition of political thought since the nineteenth century. Rawls substitutes the ideal of the social contract as a more satisfactory account of the basic rights and liberties of citizens as free and equal persons. "Each person," writes Rawls, "possesses an inviolability founded on justice that even the welfare of society as a whole cannot override." Advancing the ideas of Rousseau, Kant, Emerson, and Lincoln, Rawls's theory is as powerful today as it was when first published. |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 93
Page 127
... interests advanced by these plans are not assumed to be interests in the self , they are the interests of a self that regards its conception of the good as worthy of recognition and that advances claims in its behalf as deserving ...
... interests advanced by these plans are not assumed to be interests in the self , they are the interests of a self that regards its conception of the good as worthy of recognition and that advances claims in its behalf as deserving ...
Page 129
... interests of a self , the aims and interests are not presumed to be egoistic or selfish . Whether this is the case depends upon the kinds of ends which a person pursues . If wealth , position , and influence , and the accolades of ...
... interests of a self , the aims and interests are not presumed to be egoistic or selfish . Whether this is the case depends upon the kinds of ends which a person pursues . If wealth , position , and influence , and the accolades of ...
Page 209
... interests of man as a progressive being . By this idea he means the interests men would have and the activities they would rather pursue under conditions en- couraging freedom of choice . He adopts , in effect , a choice criterion of ...
... interests of man as a progressive being . By this idea he means the interests men would have and the activities they would rather pursue under conditions en- couraging freedom of choice . He adopts , in effect , a choice criterion of ...
Contents
JUSTICE AS FAIRNESS | 3 |
The Subject of Justice | 7 |
The Main Idea of the Theory of Justice | 11 |
Copyright | |
86 other sections not shown
Common terms and phrases
accept advantages aims apply argument arrangements assume assumptions basic structure ciples circumstances citizens civil disobedience claims conception of justice considered judgments constitution constraints contract doctrine course defined definition desire difference principle discussion distribution economic effective efficiency ends envy equal liberty ethical example expectations express fact favored feelings further greater H. L. A. Hart human idea ideal individuals inequalities initial situation injustice institutions interests interpretation intuitionism intuitive justice as fairness justified least less limits maximize means ments natural duty notion one's original position particular parties philosophical point of view political precepts preferences principle of fairness principle of utility principles of justice problem procedural justice question rational plan reason recognized reflective equilibrium regulated relevant rules scheme seems sense of justice standpoint suppose theory of justice things tion unjust utilitarian veil of ignorance W. G. Runciman well-ordered society