Proceedings of the ... International Conference on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering, Volume 5American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 2007 - Arctic regions |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 59
Page 286
... limit of 2.85d was imposed upon H. Zhao et al . ( 2001 ) discovered upon use of this breaking criterion that it caused breaking to initiate too far offshore and proposed an improvement to the criterion . It was proposed that a lower limit ...
... limit of 2.85d was imposed upon H. Zhao et al . ( 2001 ) discovered upon use of this breaking criterion that it caused breaking to initiate too far offshore and proposed an improvement to the criterion . It was proposed that a lower limit ...
Page 288
... limit fall in the same region . The major difference between these two is that at the limit of set down the Massel ( 1992 ) model with lower limit gives quite a sharp change whereas the Battjes and Janssen ( 1978 ) model turns more ...
... limit fall in the same region . The major difference between these two is that at the limit of set down the Massel ( 1992 ) model with lower limit gives quite a sharp change whereas the Battjes and Janssen ( 1978 ) model turns more ...
Page 568
... limit , the inequality sign in the above expression is replaced with an equality sign , from which one can solve for the influence coefficient : C = Rcode Lcode For reliability analysis , a limit - state function g ( x ) must be ...
... limit , the inequality sign in the above expression is replaced with an equality sign , from which one can solve for the influence coefficient : C = Rcode Lcode For reliability analysis , a limit - state function g ( x ) must be ...
Contents
OCEAN SPACE UTILIZATION | 1 |
OMAE200729521 | 11 |
OMAE200729557 | 17 |
Copyright | |
67 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
26th International Conference aircushion amplitude analysis ASME bathymetry Bay of Fundy beach boundary conditions Bragg scattering breakwater buoy calculated cavitation Coastal coefficient computed Conference on Offshore Copyright 2007 density developed device diameter displacement dynamic effect element equation experimental factor floating body units flow fluid force frequency function gouge grout hydrodynamic ice load increase installed interaction linear Makran marine maximum measured Mechanics and Arctic method monopile motion mussels nonlinear Ocean ocean energy Offshore Mechanics offshore wind turbine optimization parameters pile pipe pipeline platform pontoon potential predicted pressure ratio Research response rotor scale scour depth seabed shown in Figure shrimp significant wave height simulation stray children stress structure Technology tidal power tower tsunami velocity velocity potential vertical Von Mises stress vortex water depth wave energy wave power width wind farms wind speed