The Archaeology of KnowledgeIn France, a country that awards its intellectuals the status other countries give their rock stars, Michel Foucault was part of a glittering generation of thinkers, one which also included Sartre, de Beauvoir and Deleuze. One of the great intellectual heroes of the twentieth century, Foucault was a man whose passion and reason were at the service of nearly every progressive cause of his time. From law and order, to mental health, to power and knowledge, he spearheaded public awareness of the dynamics that hold us all in thrall to a few powerful ideologies and interests. Arguably his finest work, Archaeology of Knowledge is a challenging but fantastically rewarding introduction to his ideas. -- Amazon.com. |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 21
Page 125
It is to establish what I am quite willing to call a positivity . To analyse a discursive
formation therefore is to deal with a group of verbal performances at the level of
the statements and of the form of positivity that characterizes them ; or , more ...
It is to establish what I am quite willing to call a positivity . To analyse a discursive
formation therefore is to deal with a group of verbal performances at the level of
the statements and of the form of positivity that characterizes them ; or , more ...
Page 161
... of positivity of General Grammar and Natural History ) ; to indicate the
archaeological shifts . ( e ) Lastly , to show how , from one positivity to another ,
relations of subordination or complementarity may be established ( thus in
relation to ...
... of positivity of General Grammar and Natural History ) ; to indicate the
archaeological shifts . ( e ) Lastly , to show how , from one positivity to another ,
relations of subordination or complementarity may be established ( thus in
relation to ...
Page 186
But the analysis of this functioning must be made at the level of the positivity and
of the relations between the rules of formation and the structures of scientificity . 3
. By correcting itself , by rectifying its errors , by clarifying its formulations ...
But the analysis of this functioning must be made at the level of the positivity and
of the relations between the rules of formation and the structures of scientificity . 3
. By correcting itself , by rectifying its errors , by clarifying its formulations ...
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Contents
Introduction | 3 |
The unities of discourse | 21 |
Discursive formations | 35 |
Copyright | |
12 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
accepted according already analysis appearance archaeology articulated basis beginning belong called century certain characterized concepts concerned consciousness constitute construction continuity course define definition derivation describe determine discipline discontinuity discourse discover discursive formation discursive practice dispersion domain economic effect elements emergence enunciative established example existence fact field figures formulation function give given grammar hand ideas identity individual knowledge language least less limits linguistic linked logical material meaning methods Natural History never objects once operation organization origin particular period philosophy play political positivity possible present principle problem proposition question reason refer regularity relations remain reveal role rules scientific sentence signs space speaking specific statements status structure succession term theme theoretical theory things thought tion transformations truth types unity various whole