The Archaeology of KnowledgeIn France, a country that awards its intellectuals the status other countries give their rock stars, Michel Foucault was part of a glittering generation of thinkers, one which also included Sartre, de Beauvoir and Deleuze. One of the great intellectual heroes of the twentieth century, Foucault was a man whose passion and reason were at the service of nearly every progressive cause of his time. From law and order, to mental health, to power and knowledge, he spearheaded public awareness of the dynamics that hold us all in thrall to a few powerful ideologies and interests. Arguably his finest work, Archaeology of Knowledge is a challenging but fantastically rewarding introduction to his ideas. -- Amazon.com. |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 73
Page 27
The question posed by language analysis of some discursive fact or other is
always : according to what rules has a particular statement been made , and
consequently according to what rules could other similar statements be made ?
The question posed by language analysis of some discursive fact or other is
always : according to what rules has a particular statement been made , and
consequently according to what rules could other similar statements be made ?
Page 192
Lastly , we see that the analysis of the episteme is not a way of returning to the
critical question ( given the existence of something like a science , what is its
legitimacy ? ' ) ; it is a questioning that accepts the fact of science only in order to
ask ...
Lastly , we see that the analysis of the episteme is not a way of returning to the
critical question ( given the existence of something like a science , what is its
legitimacy ? ' ) ; it is a questioning that accepts the fact of science only in order to
ask ...
Page 202
It seems to me that the difference between us lies there ( much more than in the
over - discussed question of structuralism ) . As you know , I have no great liking
for interpretation , but allow me , as a kind of game , to say what I understand you
...
It seems to me that the difference between us lies there ( much more than in the
over - discussed question of structuralism ) . As you know , I have no great liking
for interpretation , but allow me , as a kind of game , to say what I understand you
...
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Contents
Introduction | 3 |
The unities of discourse | 21 |
Discursive formations | 35 |
Copyright | |
12 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
accepted according already analysis appearance archaeology articulated basis beginning belong called century certain characterized concepts concerned consciousness constitute construction continuity course define definition derivation describe determine discipline discontinuity discourse discover discursive formation discursive practice dispersion domain economic effect elements emergence enunciative established example existence fact field figures formulation function give given grammar hand ideas identity individual knowledge language least less limits linguistic linked logical material meaning methods Natural History never objects once operation organization origin particular period philosophy play political positivity possible present principle problem proposition question reason refer regularity relations remain reveal role rules scientific sentence signs space speaking specific statements status structure succession term theme theoretical theory things thought tion transformations truth types unity various whole