The Archaeology of KnowledgeIn France, a country that awards its intellectuals the status other countries give their rock stars, Michel Foucault was part of a glittering generation of thinkers, one which also included Sartre, de Beauvoir and Deleuze. One of the great intellectual heroes of the twentieth century, Foucault was a man whose passion and reason were at the service of nearly every progressive cause of his time. From law and order, to mental health, to power and knowledge, he spearheaded public awareness of the dynamics that hold us all in thrall to a few powerful ideologies and interests. Arguably his finest work, Archaeology of Knowledge is a challenging but fantastically rewarding introduction to his ideas. -- Amazon.com. |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 36
Page 26
I shall make use of them just long enough to ask myself what unities they form ;
by what right they can claim a field that specifies them in space and a continuity
that individualizes them in time ; according to what laws they are formed ; against
...
I shall make use of them just long enough to ask myself what unities they form ;
by what right they can claim a field that specifies them in space and a continuity
that individualizes them in time ; according to what laws they are formed ; against
...
Page 121
To undertake the history of what has been said is to re - do , in the opposite
direction , the work of expression : to go back from statements preserved through
time and dispersed in space , towards that interior secret that preceded them , left
its ...
To undertake the history of what has been said is to re - do , in the opposite
direction , the work of expression : to go back from statements preserved through
time and dispersed in space , towards that interior secret that preceded them , left
its ...
Page 126
... reveals , on the other hand , why one cannot say that Darwin is talking about
the same thing as Diderot , that Laennec continues the work of Van Swieten , or
that Jevons answers the Physiocrats . It defines a limited space of communication
.
... reveals , on the other hand , why one cannot say that Darwin is talking about
the same thing as Diderot , that Laennec continues the work of Van Swieten , or
that Jevons answers the Physiocrats . It defines a limited space of communication
.
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Contents
Introduction | 3 |
The unities of discourse | 21 |
Discursive formations | 35 |
Copyright | |
12 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
accepted according already analysis appearance archaeology articulated basis beginning belong called century certain characterized concepts concerned consciousness constitute construction continuity course define definition derivation describe determine discipline discontinuity discourse discover discursive formation discursive practice dispersion domain economic effect elements emergence enunciative established example existence fact field figures formulation function give given grammar hand ideas identity individual knowledge language least less limits linguistic linked logical material meaning methods Natural History never objects once operation organization origin particular period philosophy play political positivity possible present principle problem proposition question reason refer regularity relations remain reveal role rules scientific sentence signs space speaking specific statements status structure succession term theme theoretical theory things thought tion transformations truth types unity various whole