The Archaeology of KnowledgeIn France, a country that awards its intellectuals the status other countries give their rock stars, Michel Foucault was part of a glittering generation of thinkers, one which also included Sartre, de Beauvoir and Deleuze. One of the great intellectual heroes of the twentieth century, Foucault was a man whose passion and reason were at the service of nearly every progressive cause of his time. From law and order, to mental health, to power and knowledge, he spearheaded public awareness of the dynamics that hold us all in thrall to a few powerful ideologies and interests. Arguably his finest work, Archaeology of Knowledge is a challenging but fantastically rewarding introduction to his ideas. -- Amazon.com. |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 8
Page 83
Michel Foucault. an act of formulation - something like the speech act referred to by the English analysts ? This term does not , of course , refer to the material act of speaking ( aloud or to oneself ) or of writing ( by hand or ...
Michel Foucault. an act of formulation - something like the speech act referred to by the English analysts ? This term does not , of course , refer to the material act of speaking ( aloud or to oneself ) or of writing ( by hand or ...
Page 84
... speech acts either . When one wishes to individualize statements , one cannot therefore accept unreservedly any of the models borrowed from grammar , logic , or ' analysis ' . In all three cases , one realizes that the criteria proposed ...
... speech acts either . When one wishes to individualize statements , one cannot therefore accept unreservedly any of the models borrowed from grammar , logic , or ' analysis ' . In all three cases , one realizes that the criteria proposed ...
Page 86
... speech act ; and whether the sentence is correct ( or acceptable , or interpretable ) , whether the proposition is legitimate and well constructed , whether the speech act fulfils its requirements , and was in fact carried out . We must ...
... speech act ; and whether the sentence is correct ( or acceptable , or interpretable ) , whether the proposition is legitimate and well constructed , whether the speech act fulfils its requirements , and was in fact carried out . We must ...
Contents
Introduction | 3 |
The unities of discourse | 21 |
Discursive formations | 31 |
Copyright | |
19 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
according Analysis of Wealth appearance archaeology articulated basis belong Benoît de Maillet characterized coherence concepts concerned consciousness constitute contradiction correlations define deployed describe determine discipline discontinuity discursive formation discursive practice dispersion domain economic eighteenth century elements emergence enunciative field enunciative function established example existence fact formulation grammar group of statements Hegel history of ideas identity individual Indo-European languages Jean Hyppolite knowledge language langue Lastly limits linguistic linked Linnaeus logical madness Madness and Civilization meaning medicine modalities Natural History nineteenth century notions objects œuvre operation origin particular philosophy Physiocratic play political Port-Royal positivity possible principle problem proposition psychopathology question rediscover refer regularity relations reveal role rules of formation scientific sentence signs speaking subject specific speech act status structure succession system of formation teleology theme theory things thought threshold tion transformations truth types unity whole words