The Archaeology of KnowledgeIn France, a country that awards its intellectuals the status other countries give their rock stars, Michel Foucault was part of a glittering generation of thinkers, one which also included Sartre, de Beauvoir and Deleuze. One of the great intellectual heroes of the twentieth century, Foucault was a man whose passion and reason were at the service of nearly every progressive cause of his time. From law and order, to mental health, to power and knowledge, he spearheaded public awareness of the dynamics that hold us all in thrall to a few powerful ideologies and interests. Arguably his finest work, Archaeology of Knowledge is a challenging but fantastically rewarding introduction to his ideas. -- Amazon.com. |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 31
Page 56
Or should it be seen as a succession of conceptual systems , each possessing its
own organization , and being articulated only against the permanence of
problems , the continuity of tradition , or the mechanism of influences ? Could a
law not ...
Or should it be seen as a succession of conceptual systems , each possessing its
own organization , and being articulated only against the permanence of
problems , the continuity of tradition , or the mechanism of influences ? Could a
law not ...
Page 167
Moreover , we have seen that the order of statements based on archaeological
derivation did not necessarily reproduce the order of successions : one can find
in Beauzée statements that are archaeologically anterior to those to be found in ...
Moreover , we have seen that the order of statements based on archaeological
derivation did not necessarily reproduce the order of successions : one can find
in Beauzée statements that are archaeologically anterior to those to be found in ...
Page 169
Far from being indifferent to succession , archaeology maps the temporal vectors
of derivation . Archaeology does not set out to treat as simultaneous what is given
as successive ; it does not try to freeze time and to substitute for its flux of ...
Far from being indifferent to succession , archaeology maps the temporal vectors
of derivation . Archaeology does not set out to treat as simultaneous what is given
as successive ; it does not try to freeze time and to substitute for its flux of ...
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Contents
Introduction | 3 |
The unities of discourse | 21 |
Discursive formations | 35 |
Copyright | |
12 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
accepted according already analysis appearance archaeology articulated basis beginning belong called century certain characterized concepts concerned consciousness constitute construction continuity course define definition derivation describe determine discipline discontinuity discourse discover discursive formation discursive practice dispersion domain economic effect elements emergence enunciative established example existence fact field figures formulation function give given grammar hand ideas identity individual knowledge language least less limits linguistic linked logical material meaning methods Natural History never objects once operation organization origin particular period philosophy play political positivity possible present principle problem proposition question reason refer regularity relations remain reveal role rules scientific sentence signs space speaking specific statements status structure succession term theme theoretical theory things thought tion transformations truth types unity various whole