The Archaeology of KnowledgeIn France, a country that awards its intellectuals the status other countries give their rock stars, Michel Foucault was part of a glittering generation of thinkers, one which also included Sartre, de Beauvoir and Deleuze. One of the great intellectual heroes of the twentieth century, Foucault was a man whose passion and reason were at the service of nearly every progressive cause of his time. From law and order, to mental health, to power and knowledge, he spearheaded public awareness of the dynamics that hold us all in thrall to a few powerful ideologies and interests. Arguably his finest work, Archaeology of Knowledge is a challenging but fantastically rewarding introduction to his ideas. -- Amazon.com. |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 71
Page 48
The sagacity of the commentators is not mistaken : from the kind of analysis that I
have undertaken , words are as deliberately absent as things themselves ; any
description of a vocabulary is as lacking as any reference to the living plenitude
of ...
The sagacity of the commentators is not mistaken : from the kind of analysis that I
have undertaken , words are as deliberately absent as things themselves ; any
description of a vocabulary is as lacking as any reference to the living plenitude
of ...
Page 143
Identity is not a criterion even when it is exhaustive ; even less so when it is
partial , when words are not used each time in the same sense , or when the
same nucleus of meaning is apprehended through different words : to what
extent can ...
Identity is not a criterion even when it is exhaustive ; even less so when it is
partial , when words are not used each time in the same sense , or when the
same nucleus of meaning is apprehended through different words : to what
extent can ...
Page 217
His words were considered nul and void , without truth or significance , worthless
as evidence , inadmissible in the authentification of acts or contracts , incapable
even of bringing about transubstantiation - the transformation of bread into flesh ...
His words were considered nul and void , without truth or significance , worthless
as evidence , inadmissible in the authentification of acts or contracts , incapable
even of bringing about transubstantiation - the transformation of bread into flesh ...
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Contents
Introduction | 3 |
The unities of discourse | 21 |
Discursive formations | 35 |
Copyright | |
12 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
accepted according already analysis appearance archaeology articulated basis beginning belong called century certain characterized concepts concerned consciousness constitute construction continuity course define definition derivation describe determine discipline discontinuity discourse discover discursive formation discursive practice dispersion domain economic effect elements emergence enunciative established example existence fact field figures formulation function give given grammar hand ideas identity individual knowledge language least less limits linguistic linked logical material meaning methods Natural History never objects once operation organization origin particular period philosophy play political positivity possible present principle problem proposition question reason refer regularity relations remain reveal role rules scientific sentence signs space speaking specific statements status structure succession term theme theoretical theory things thought tion transformations truth types unity various whole