| Stuart S. Nagel - Political Science - 336 pages
...all warning signals from the rivals and constructing alternative scenarios of the rivals' intentions. 9. After reaching a preliminary consensus about what...group should hold a "second chance" meeting at which every member is expected to express as vividly as he can all his residual doubts and to rethink the... | |
| Harold J. Leavitt, Louis R. Pondy, David M. Boje - Business & Economics - 1989 - 783 pages
...to meet separately, under different chairmen, and then come back together to hammer out differences. 9. After reaching a preliminary consensus about what seems to be the best policy, the group should hold a "second-chance" meeting at which every member expresses as vividly as he can... | |
| Herbert C. Kelman, V. Lee Hamilton - Psychology - 1989 - 408 pages
...consensus, groups hold “second chance” meetings “at which every member is expected to express. residual doubts and to rethink the entire issue before making a definitive choice” (p. 218). Another set of recommendations offered by Janis (1972) to counteract groupthink... | |
| Betsy B. Holli, Richard J. Calabrese, Julie O'Sullivan Maillet - Communication - 2003 - 404 pages
...play the "devil's advocate," challenging the testimony of those who advocate the majority position. 7. After reaching a preliminary consensus about what seems to be the best policy, the group should hold a "second-chance" meeting, during which members express all their residual doubts... | |
| Dr. Michael Adewale Adeniyi, Ph.D. - Business & Economics - 2007 - 238 pages
...all warning signals from the rivals and constructing alternative scenarios of the rivals' intentions. 9. After reaching a preliminary consensus about what...be the best policy alternative, the policy-making teamp should hold a "second chance" meeting at which every member is expected to express as vividly... | |
| Hermann J. Stern (Jr.) - 2006 - 304 pages
...constmcting alternative scenarios of the rivals' intentions." JANIS, 1972, 218 (im Original kursiv): „After reaching a preliminary consensus about what...group should hold a 'second chance' meeting at which every member is expected to express äs vividly äs he can all his residual doubts and to rethink the... | |
| |