Resolution of Minor Disputes: Joint Hearings Before the Subcommittee on Courts, Civil Liberties, and the Administration of Justice of the Committee on the Judiciary and Subcommittee on Consumer Protection and Finance of the Committee on Interstate and Foreign Commerce, House of Representatives, Ninety-sixth Congress, First Session, on Resolution of Minor Disputes, June 6, 7, 14, and 18, 1979
United States. Congress. House. Committee on the Judiciary. Subcommittee on Courts, Civil Liberties, and the Administration of Justice
U.S. Government Printing Office, 1979 - Arbitration and award - 669 pages
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Other editions - View all
action addition administrative agencies alternative American appropriate arbitration assistance Association Attorney bills Board Center Chairman citizens civil clients Committee complaints concern consumer cost County criminal deal Department dispute resolution dispute resolution mechanisms effective efforts encourage established evaluation example existing experience fact Federal forums funding grant groups handle hearing housing important improve individual institutions interest involved issue judges judicial Justice kind lawyers legislation limited major matters mediation minor disputes neighborhood operation organizations parties percent person practice present problems procedures proposed prosecutor's question reason receive referred represent require resolve responsibility result serve settlement small claims courts social staff suggest Thank tion types York
Page 213 - ... be admitted as evidence or used for any purpose in any action, suit, or other judicial or administrative proceeding.
Page 24 - The gentleman from North Carolina, Mr. Gudger. Mr. GUDGER. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. I...
Page 315 - Wright, The Courts and the Rulemaking Process: The Limits of Judicial Review, 59 CORNELL L.
Page 324 - European Alternatives to Criminal Trials and Their Applicability in the United States.
Page 317 - Rosenberg and Schubin, Trial by Lawyer: Compulsory Arbitration of Small Claims in Pennsylvania, 74 HARV.
Page 326 - Implementation Problems in Institutional Reform Litigation, 91 Harv. L. Rev. 428 (1977). Note, Judicial Intervention in Corrections: The California Experience. 20 UCLAL Rev. 452 (1973). Note, "Mastering" Intervention in Prisons, 88 Yale LJ 1062 (1979).
Page 321 - Stewart, The Reformation of American Administrative Law, 88 Harv. L. Rev. 1667 (1975).
Page 216 - ... (b) It is the purpose of this Act to assist the States and other interested parties in providing to all persons convenient access to dispute resolution mechanisms which are effective, fair, inexpensive, and expeditious. § 3. Definitions For purposes of this Act— (1) the term "Advisory Board...
Page 89 - For ordinary causes our contentious system has great merit as a means of getting at the truth. But it is a denial of justice in small causes to drive litigants to employ lawyers and it is a shame to drive them to legal aid societies to get as charity what the state should give as a right.