The reader will perhaps wonder to be told that Mr. William L. Garrison, the noted abolitionist of Boston, is set down as one of Miss Martineau's originals. The description of his originality, however, occupying five pages, is a highly colored sketch of his life, in which he is depicted as one of the noblest of saints and martyrs, and one of the greatest men living; and not only this, but "the most bewitching personage" Miss Martineau had met with in the United States. But this will excite no surprise in the minds of those who understand that with Miss Martineau the possession of notoriety is greatness, and that agreement in opinion with herself is excellence.

But we must take leave of Miss Martineau. It is not because either herself or her opinions are intrinsically of any particular importance, that we have given so much space to her in our pages. But, writing about America-being English-being a woman -and more than all, being in such sisterly relations with the little coterie of amiable but very absurd personages whose habits of self-homage and mutual reputation-making we have commemorated;-all these circumstances have conspired to give her and her books an accidental and temporary notoriety, which we hope she will not mistake for any thing more solid and lasting.

For ourselves, we truly profess to entertain nothing but the kindliest feeling towards Miss Martineau. All her conceit and folly have not prevented our conviction that she is at the bottom an amiable, honest, and true hearted woman. Talent, also, of a certain order, and in no mean degree, we have allowed her to possess. As to the thousand mistakes of judgment and fact she has committed in her statements respecting the institutions, the men, and things of this country-whereof not the tithe have ever been noticed by any of her critics;-if we consider the cast of her political prejudices, her easy credulity, the clique through whose eyes she looked at almost every thing in the country, we have a full explanation of them. full explanation of them. Neither at these, nor yet at the political doctrines she puts forth in both her works, do we find it in our hearts to be angry, as some of our journals have been. False as they are in principle-and often also in fact, as is the case of her interpretations of our constitution-and abominable in consequences, yet their crudity, or rather their sheer unfathomable absurdity, combined with her self-complacent air, her quiet positiveness, and total unconsciousness that in the eyes of true statesmen of all parties, she is all the time betraying her igno

rance of the very first principles of political science—all this excites so strongly the sense of the ludicrous, that we are tempted to abandon ourselves to pure merriment. But to speak seriously: Time and God's Providence will dispose of those great political and social questions, which Miss Martineau so confidently prates and so rashly prophesies about. To Time and God's Providence we leave them.

In concluding, we must, however, for the benefit of our English readers, distinctly repeat a warning which we have already more than once indirectly given. It respects the manner in which Miss Martineau manufactures reputations. We beg them not to take Miss Martineau's bead-roll of American great men on trust. There are many names on it, which the American people have never recognized as great-some indeed are scarcely known at all; and her representations give no correct view of the relative estimation in which others are held. "In America," says she, "there is no need to explain who Father Taylor is." Now, out of Boston, and the region around it, we are confident, nine hundred and ninety-nine out of every thousand persons in America are entirely ignorant who "Father Taylor" is. "Mr. Emerson" is another of Miss Martineau's eminent men. Mr. Emerson is a young man, a ci-devant unitarian pastor, well enough known in Boston and its vicinity, among his own communion: a very worthy and respectable man, as we happen to know a man of talent and accomplishment; and we certainly do him the credit to believe, that Miss Martineau's foolish exaggerations, so calculated to mislead the British public as to the kind and extent of reputation he enjoys in America, will be anything but gratifying to him. Then, as to "Dr. F.," his wife, "little Charley," and many others, we can assure the good people of England, that they figure on Miss Martineau's pages with a wonderful deal more of consideration and consequence than they enjoy in America. It is just so in regard to almost everybody with whom Miss Martineau lived, or who belonged to the coterie with which she lived;-she makes them out to be not only the greatest and most excellent, but also the most eminent and considered persons in America. The people of this country will learn with some surprise, from Miss Martineau's revelations, what great personages are among them.

ART VII.-1. Education Reform, or the necessity of a National System of Education. By THOMAS WYSE, Esq., M. P. London: 1836. 8vo. pp. 553.

2. Hints on a System of Popular Education. By E. C. WINES. Philadelphia: 1838. 12mo. pp. 255.

3. Report on Elementary Public Instruction in Europe, made to the Thirty-sixth General Assembly of the State of Ohio. By C. E. STOWE. 12mo. pp. 61.

4. Annual Report of the Regents of the University of the State of New York, made to the Legislature, March 1, 1838. 8vo. pp. 220.

No one of the many enterprises for the moral improvement of mankind, now claiming public attention, is of such momentous interest, as that which forms the subject of the publications placed at the head of this article:-how shall the rising generations of man be prepared for their duty and their destiny? is the true import of the question they present. In this wide sense, it is a question of very recent origin-the plan of making education universal and a concern of the state, is a suggestion of the present age, and in claiming for it this honor, we are not forgetful of what is due to New England, and Scotland, for their early established free and parochial schools. The usages of antiquity in relation to the whole matter were entirely different from those of modern times; education was then altogether an individual care there were no national institutions of learning-none for public gratuitous instruction. The schools in Persia, Egypt, Palestine, and India, were royal, or priestly, or Braminic; the schools of philosophy in Greece were limited to the single object which their name expresses, and not intended for youthful disciples. The education of children was everywhere domestic; the training was parental, and the teaching private; which system was continued when they advanced to maturer age. The laws of Lycurgus and Solon did not form an exception-the Spartan education was purely military, for public service-the Athenian was not paid out of the public treasury. The rhetorical schools of Rome in her imperial days, and the Athenæa at Athens, may have answered some of the purposes of our modern universities, but they were open only to a small portion of the community,

and they furnish no reason for believing that general, intellectual culture, was ever regarded as an essential element of ancient civilization. Nor did the introduction of Christianity materially af fect the condition of society in this respect; it is not its province to supersede the necessity of human exertion in anything, which by the laws of man's nature depends on the exercise of his own faculties. Besides, at the time when its authority was first recognized, the world was scourged by devastating wars, and wide spreading invasions, which would have defeated every effort to establish institutions of learning, had any been attempted. The little there was of learning assumed the cowl, and fled for refuge to the cloister; the clergy alone had the keys of knowledge, and they opened its treasures only to those whom they trained for their own order. Conventual and cathedral schools, which they superintended, instructed but a small number, and confined their instruction to a very narrow circle of studies. This circle was first enlarged by the liberal mind of Charlemagne; he formed plans for a broad system of national education-every parish was to have its common schools, and every bishop's see and convent, a higher seminary for the instruction of the clergy and public officers;-unhappily for the great cause he had espoused, his life was too short for the accomplishment of his vast projects of improvement; and as the inheritors of his throne were not also inheritors of his genius and spirit, these projects were either forgotten or neglected. Not a century afterward, a similar attempt was made in England by the wise and benevolent. Alfred, and in like manner with only partial success; the splendid school establishments which he founded, scarcely outlived his own time. When we examine minutely into the plans of education formed by these two great princes, we find them narrow and exclusive, compared with the system of our own days, broad and liberal as they were for the times in which they originated; the schools of Charlemagne prove to have been establishments substantially ecclesiastical, and those of Alfred open only to the children of freeholders possessed of two ploughs; and they certainly did not sow the seeds from which more popular institutions were to spring, as neither of the countries in which they were established has as yet produced such fruits. For centuries there was no subsequent attempt to provide institutions for public instruction, as liberal even as those just cited; but as soon as learning escaped from the cloisters, it was everywhere greeted with a generous and general enthusiasm; thousands and tens of thousands collected in voluntary societies to listen to its

revelations which societies received the name of universities, as the teachers and students were united in one corporate body. Thus, these establishments, vilified as aristocratic, were, in their origin, purely popular gatherings-a rush of the multitude, thirsting for knowledge, to the fountain which had burst forth to supply it. It was not a royally endowed institution; it was the eloquence of a poor Benedictine monk that so crowded Paris with students in the twelfth century, as to make it necessary to extend the walls of the city, their number, as is said by contemporaneous writers, exceeding that of its stated inhabitants. The impulse once given, or rather the shackles once removed from the human mind, a desire for knowledge spread throughout Europe, and filled it with universities. Still the volume of man's destiny was not then sufficiently unrolled to develop the great improving principle, that now promises more for the elevation of his individual character, and the amelioration of his social condition, than all other influences, Christianity excepted. It was an intellectual and not a moral light that broke forth upon that age; it dispelled ignorance, but it did not warm the social affections; even the triumph of liberty was but partial-it established republics in Italy, and freed the communes in France and Germany, but the use of the victory was rather selfish than generous -the few were enfranchised, the many were left manacled-the doors of the upper rooms only of the prison were opened, those of the cells and dungeons remained as firmly barred and bolted as ever. A system of popular education could not therefore at that time have been devised; no such notion could have entered into the breasts of those who alone had power to establish it, and there was no people, properly speaking, to receive the benefits of it; a great political action, which required centuries to mature and effect, was the necessary precursor of this grand step in the march of humanity.

Various opportunities for intellectual improvement were provided for a portion of the community, by the chapter, and charity, and other schools for higher instruction. The intercourse which the Crusaders had opened with the East, and still more the flight of many learned Greeks from Constantinople, made Western Europe acquainted with the precious relics of ancient learning of which that city had been the depository, and determined the course of all higher mental culture and discipline from that time to the present, and, as we hope, until genius directed by philosophy shall invent a more perfect language than the Greek, and the inspirations of the poetic muse breathe forth in loftier