Study Paper: Materials Prepared in Connection with the Study of Employment, Growth, and Price Levels, for the Consideration by the Joint Economic Committee, Congress of the United States, Issue 23

Front Cover
U.S. Government Printing Office, 1959 - Labor
 

Common terms and phrases

Popular passages

Page 14 - Class 1. Class 2. Class 3. Class 1. Class 2. Class 3. Class 4.
Page 3 - If the rate of unemployment in these areas could have been reduced to the national average, the jobless total would have been roughly a quarter of a million lower at that time.
Page 22 - ... the following 30 days (and were not in school during the survey week) or (6) who would have been looking for work except that they were temporarily ill or believed no work was available in their line of work in the community. TABLE 1. — Standard error of level of monthly estimates [In thousands] Size of estimate Both sexes Male Female Total or white Nonwhite Total or white Nonwhite Total or white Nonwhite 10 5 11 15 24 34...
Page 1 - Unemployment that stems from these causes is usually concentrated geographically, thus affecting the jobs and incomes of persons not immediately connected with the distressed industry. As a result, as we have seen, entire areas are dragged into a state of economic decline. In addition to the relatively industrialized areas both large and small, information flowing into this Department as part of the normal operations of our Federal-State employment security programs indicates that...
Page 1 - ... employment opportunities for several years, labor force growth may be slow in relation to the increase in population, and concealed unemployment exists. Such a tendency in recent years is indicated in chart 6-2 ; the actual labor force in 1959 is about 700,000 persons below the long-term trend. * Study paper No. 6, "The Extent and Nature of Frictional Unemployment, US Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics, Nov.
Page 25 - U nder 25 years 25 to 34 years 45 to 54 years 65 years and over Not reporting age GEORGIA All farm operators.
Page 2 - ... unemployment during the recession, but recovery thereafter. Class 3 — Areas of either chronic labor surplus, or which became areas of substantial labor surplus during the recent recession and had not recovered as of the spring of 1959. These areas were still classed as D, E, or F in May 1959.3 ' US Department of Labor, Bureau of Employment Security, "Chronic Labor Surplus Areas, Experience and Outlook,

Bibliographic information