Proceedings of the Idaho State Bar, Volume 27Vols. 11 (1935)- include Proceedings of the Judicial Section, v. 1- |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 78
Page 86
Idaho State Bar. sion . It again came up when I served on this commission in 1942 to 1948. I understand it has now come up once more . One of the younger professors at the University has made the suggestion that the members of the law ...
Idaho State Bar. sion . It again came up when I served on this commission in 1942 to 1948. I understand it has now come up once more . One of the younger professors at the University has made the suggestion that the members of the law ...
Page 15
Idaho State Bar. deep study and action by both state and local bar associations , particularly in those communities which are afflicted with such practice . We have attempted to ascertain the work done nationally relative to adoption of ...
Idaho State Bar. deep study and action by both state and local bar associations , particularly in those communities which are afflicted with such practice . We have attempted to ascertain the work done nationally relative to adoption of ...
Page 10
Idaho State Bar. MR. DWORSHAK: There is some question about that. I don't know whether the other members of the committee agree, in our first opinion we raised that question and decided that it would take further rule-making by our ...
Idaho State Bar. MR. DWORSHAK: There is some question about that. I don't know whether the other members of the committee agree, in our first opinion we raised that question and decided that it would take further rule-making by our ...
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
action adopted agreement amendment American Bar Association annual answer appointed attorney Bar Association basis believe called carried charge client Commission Commissioners Committee considered continue cost counsel course court deduction defendant discussion District doctor don't effect examination expenses fact Federal feel give given going Idaho State Bar important income individual injury institute interest judges jury justice lawyer legislation look matter mean meeting motion never opinion particular partnership passed payments perhaps person possible practice prepared present President problem procedure profession proposed question reason received recommend relations resolution respect result rules schedule situation Smith stand statement suggest Supreme Court talk tell Thank thing thought trial United votes wife witness