Proceedings of the Idaho State Bar, Volume 27Vols. 11 (1935)- include Proceedings of the Judicial Section, v. 1- |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 81
Page 30
Sometimes they did and sometimes they said , “ Well , this is based on a judgment . ” And they ruled in that fashion . Finally , in 1950 , the Harris Case ( 95 ) came to the Supreme Court . This is important for two reasons .
Sometimes they did and sometimes they said , “ Well , this is based on a judgment . ” And they ruled in that fashion . Finally , in 1950 , the Harris Case ( 95 ) came to the Supreme Court . This is important for two reasons .
Page 28
The defendant applied to the Supreme Court for an Interlocutory Appeal , which was granted . Rules 26 , 30 and 34 were particularly discussed by the court with the final determination that the order of the Trial Court be affirmed and ...
The defendant applied to the Supreme Court for an Interlocutory Appeal , which was granted . Rules 26 , 30 and 34 were particularly discussed by the court with the final determination that the order of the Trial Court be affirmed and ...
Page 93
I noticed in your resolution that the terms are very broad and no specific action of the Supreme Court is pinpointed , and the resolution amounts , as I understand it , to a general condemnation of the Supreme Court .
I noticed in your resolution that the terms are very broad and no specific action of the Supreme Court is pinpointed , and the resolution amounts , as I understand it , to a general condemnation of the Supreme Court .
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
action adopted agreement amendment American Bar Association annual answer appointed attorney Bar Association basis believe called carried charge client Commission Commissioners Committee considered continue cost counsel course court deduction defendant discussion District doctor don't effect examination expenses fact Federal feel give given going Idaho State Bar important income individual injury institute interest judges jury justice lawyer legislation look matter mean meeting motion never opinion particular partnership passed payments perhaps person possible practice prepared present President problem procedure profession proposed question reason received recommend relations resolution respect result rules schedule situation Smith stand statement suggest Supreme Court talk tell Thank thing thought trial United votes wife witness