Proceedings of the Idaho State Bar, Volume 27Capital News Publishing Company, 1953 - Bar associations Vols. 11 (1935)- include Proceedings of the Judicial Section, v. 1- |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 71
Page 41
... Doctor , we are dealing here with a claim of sacroiliac injury . ” “ Yes . ” " In order to make a diagnosis , you must know anatomy . You have to know the anatomy of the sacroiliac joint . Now , Doctor , you know that , don't you ? " At ...
... Doctor , we are dealing here with a claim of sacroiliac injury . ” “ Yes . ” " In order to make a diagnosis , you must know anatomy . You have to know the anatomy of the sacroiliac joint . Now , Doctor , you know that , don't you ? " At ...
Page 42
... doctor to judge the condition of this plaintiff , Dr. Jones , that the defendant called and paid $ 150 or $ 200 , or Dr. Smith , the doctor I called , the doctor who delivers the babies , who takes care of the sick in our own community ...
... doctor to judge the condition of this plaintiff , Dr. Jones , that the defendant called and paid $ 150 or $ 200 , or Dr. Smith , the doctor I called , the doctor who delivers the babies , who takes care of the sick in our own community ...
Page 115
... doctor ? MR . L. F. RACINE : My understanding as to the passage of this type of compact in Oregon is not to fix the property rights of third parties , of patient and doctor . This is simply a statement of principle between the doctors ...
... doctor ? MR . L. F. RACINE : My understanding as to the passage of this type of compact in Oregon is not to fix the property rights of third parties , of patient and doctor . This is simply a statement of principle between the doctors ...
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
action adopted agreement amendment American Bar Association annual answer appointed attorney Bar Association basis believe called carried charge client Commission Commissioners Committee considered continue cost counsel course court deduction defendant discussion District doctor don't effect examination expenses fact Federal feel give given going Idaho State Bar important income injury institute interest judges jury justice lawyer legislation look matter mean meeting motion move never opinion particular partnership passed payments perhaps person possible practice prepared present President problem procedure profession proposed question reason received recommend relations resolution respect result rules schedule situation Smith stand statement suggest Supreme Court talk tell Thank thing thought trial United votes wife witness