Proceedings of the Idaho State Bar, Volume 27Capital News Publishing Company, 1953 - Bar associations Vols. 11 (1935)- include Proceedings of the Judicial Section, v. 1- |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 52
Page 19
... payments from one to the other . Congress didn't intend for one to get deduction for paying his creditor , just because the creditor was his wife . The theory is that payment must be in lieu of the obligation of the laws of every state ...
... payments from one to the other . Congress didn't intend for one to get deduction for paying his creditor , just because the creditor was his wife . The theory is that payment must be in lieu of the obligation of the laws of every state ...
Page 20
... payments paid under the agreement after the decree . ( 51 ) There is an exception to the general rule denying the deduction in that if the support obligation continues after the divorce , and this is very rare , or after the decree of ...
... payments paid under the agreement after the decree . ( 51 ) There is an exception to the general rule denying the deduction in that if the support obligation continues after the divorce , and this is very rare , or after the decree of ...
Page 38
Idaho State Bar. the liquidation payment and excess payments will not arise until the final year of the period of continuing payments , at which time the retiring or deceased partner's interest will actually be liquidated . 19. The payment ...
Idaho State Bar. the liquidation payment and excess payments will not arise until the final year of the period of continuing payments , at which time the retiring or deceased partner's interest will actually be liquidated . 19. The payment ...
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
action adopted agreement amendment American Bar Association annual answer appointed attorney Bar Association basis believe called carried charge client Commission Commissioners Committee considered continue cost counsel course court deduction defendant discussion District doctor don't effect examination expenses fact Federal feel give given going Idaho State Bar important income injury institute interest judges jury justice lawyer legislation look matter mean meeting motion move never opinion particular partnership passed payments perhaps person possible practice prepared present President problem procedure profession proposed question reason received recommend relations resolution respect result rules schedule situation Smith stand statement suggest Supreme Court talk tell Thank thing thought trial United votes wife witness