Proceedings of the Idaho State Bar, Volume 27Vols. 11 (1935)- include Proceedings of the Judicial Section, v. 1- |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 82
Page 23
He may have a problem on how much expense he has in the crop , but if you represent the buyer , you want to be sure of the time the transaction is closed so that the buyer can determine what the fair market values of the growing crops ...
He may have a problem on how much expense he has in the crop , but if you represent the buyer , you want to be sure of the time the transaction is closed so that the buyer can determine what the fair market values of the growing crops ...
Page 28
The Treasury Department essentially tried to use Sections 45 , 41 and 42 against us on the problem . In one district they conceded the case and even allowed an operating loss carry back to the corporation based on the crop expense .
The Treasury Department essentially tried to use Sections 45 , 41 and 42 against us on the problem . In one district they conceded the case and even allowed an operating loss carry back to the corporation based on the crop expense .
Page 83
Then , “ Why not the Superintendent of Public Instruction , and why not the Commissioner of Agriculture , and why not this and why not that ? ” So , unless your program is broad , an attempt to solve the whole problem , you are going ...
Then , “ Why not the Superintendent of Public Instruction , and why not the Commissioner of Agriculture , and why not this and why not that ? ” So , unless your program is broad , an attempt to solve the whole problem , you are going ...
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
action adopted agreement amendment American Bar Association annual answer appointed attorney Bar Association basis believe called carried charge client Commission Commissioners Committee considered continue cost counsel course court deduction defendant discussion District doctor don't effect examination expenses fact Federal feel give given going Idaho State Bar important income individual injury institute interest judges jury justice lawyer legislation look matter mean meeting motion never opinion particular partnership passed payments perhaps person possible practice prepared present President problem procedure profession proposed question reason received recommend relations resolution respect result rules schedule situation Smith stand statement suggest Supreme Court talk tell Thank thing thought trial United votes wife witness