Proceedings of the Idaho State Bar, Volume 27Vols. 11 (1935)- include Proceedings of the Judicial Section, v. 1- |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 80
Page 75
E. B. SMITH : Members of the Bar , discussion had at the 1953 annual meeting of the Idaho Bar presented the question , and a committee was appointed to report whether the Bar should sponsor the proposed Uniform Commercial Code as part ...
E. B. SMITH : Members of the Bar , discussion had at the 1953 annual meeting of the Idaho Bar presented the question , and a committee was appointed to report whether the Bar should sponsor the proposed Uniform Commercial Code as part ...
Page 90
The proposed Idaho Rules preserve the right of counsel to conduct the voir dire examination . In most Federal courts today the interrogation is handled entirely by the judge , who generally permits counsel to suggest additional ...
The proposed Idaho Rules preserve the right of counsel to conduct the voir dire examination . In most Federal courts today the interrogation is handled entirely by the judge , who generally permits counsel to suggest additional ...
Page 108
Your Committee members and other cooperating attorneys met with the realtors in Idaho Falls , Pocatello , Twin Falls , Boise , Lewiston and Coeur d'Alene and presented the proposed Agreement , which is patterned after that adopted by ...
Your Committee members and other cooperating attorneys met with the realtors in Idaho Falls , Pocatello , Twin Falls , Boise , Lewiston and Coeur d'Alene and presented the proposed Agreement , which is patterned after that adopted by ...
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
action adopted agreement amendment American Bar Association annual answer appointed attorney Bar Association basis believe called carried charge client Commission Commissioners Committee considered continue cost counsel course court deduction defendant discussion District doctor don't effect examination expenses fact Federal feel give given going Idaho State Bar important income individual injury institute interest judges jury justice lawyer legislation look matter mean meeting motion never opinion particular partnership passed payments perhaps person possible practice prepared present President problem procedure profession proposed question reason received recommend relations resolution respect result rules schedule situation Smith stand statement suggest Supreme Court talk tell Thank thing thought trial United votes wife witness