Proceedings of the Idaho State Bar, Volume 27Vols. 11 (1935)- include Proceedings of the Judicial Section, v. 1- |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 91
Page 65
trial to the stories told by other witnesses similarly disposed . ... If you get such a witness on the other side it is absurd to think that such a witness is going to change lightly his direct testimony , or admit that he has made a ...
trial to the stories told by other witnesses similarly disposed . ... If you get such a witness on the other side it is absurd to think that such a witness is going to change lightly his direct testimony , or admit that he has made a ...
Page 69
The witness is the “ under dog ” and the jury's sympathies are ordinarily with him . Mr. Osborne suggests , " violence of crossexamination is often the measure of the importance of the testimony to which it is directed .
The witness is the “ under dog ” and the jury's sympathies are ordinarily with him . Mr. Osborne suggests , " violence of crossexamination is often the measure of the importance of the testimony to which it is directed .
Page 71
When it becomes apparent that the witness is trying to evade a question , the cross - examiner's effort should be concentrated upon keeping the witness to the original question asked . With a clever witness this requires persistence .
When it becomes apparent that the witness is trying to evade a question , the cross - examiner's effort should be concentrated upon keeping the witness to the original question asked . With a clever witness this requires persistence .
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
action adopted agreement amendment American Bar Association annual answer appointed attorney Bar Association basis believe called carried charge client Commission Commissioners Committee considered continue cost counsel course court deduction defendant discussion District doctor don't effect examination expenses fact Federal feel give given going Idaho State Bar important income individual injury institute interest judges jury justice lawyer legislation look matter mean meeting motion never opinion particular partnership passed payments perhaps person possible practice prepared present President problem procedure profession proposed question reason received recommend relations resolution respect result rules schedule situation Smith stand statement suggest Supreme Court talk tell Thank thing thought trial United votes wife witness