Connecticut Bar Journal, Volume 56Connecticut Bar Association, 1982 - Bar associations Includes Annual reports, and lists of members. |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 69
Page 72
American Radiator and Standard Sanitary Corp. , 487 F.2d 161 3rd Cir . 1973 ) [ Lindy I ) ; Lindy Bros. Builders , Inc. v . American Radiator and Standard Corp. , 540 F.2d 102 ( 3rd Cir . 1976 ) , en banc ( Lindy II ] ; Hughes v .
American Radiator and Standard Sanitary Corp. , 487 F.2d 161 3rd Cir . 1973 ) [ Lindy I ) ; Lindy Bros. Builders , Inc. v . American Radiator and Standard Corp. , 540 F.2d 102 ( 3rd Cir . 1976 ) , en banc ( Lindy II ] ; Hughes v .
Page 168
The SuSupreme Court noted that to prevail in a malpractice action “ the plaintiff must establish through expert testimony both the standard of care and the fact that the defendant's conduct did not measure up to that standard .
The SuSupreme Court noted that to prevail in a malpractice action “ the plaintiff must establish through expert testimony both the standard of care and the fact that the defendant's conduct did not measure up to that standard .
Page 373
Moreover , someone contending that this standard was met in an inappropriate manner should face a heavy burden of proof . If basic standards of competence are being met , it is hard to maintain that the Bar may properly dictate the way ...
Moreover , someone contending that this standard was met in an inappropriate manner should face a heavy burden of proof . If basic standards of competence are being met , it is hard to maintain that the Bar may properly dictate the way ...
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Contents
Connecticut Supreme Court Review | 1 |
Family Law Arthur E Balbirer | 26 |
Attorneys Fees Under | 66 |
28 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
42 Conn action administration agreement amendment American appeal apply appointment Association attorney authority award cause charge child civil claim client Committee common concern Connecticut considered constitutional continue corporate counsel criminal custody decided decision defendant denied determine discussed dissenting effect evidence fact federal federal courts fees filed final finding firm future granted held important increase individual interest involved issue Judge judgment judicial jurisdiction jury Justice lawyers liability limited litigation majority matter motion motion in limine opinion parties period person plaintiff practice present principle prior problems profession protection question reasonable received record relations represent responsibility result rule separation standard Stat statute Supp supra Supreme Court tion tort trial court United violation