The Penal System: An IntroductionNow fully revised, this highly successful textbook provides a clear and comprehensive introduction to the penal system in England and Wales. Michael Cavadino and James Dignan examine all aspects of the penal process, including details of the recent dramatic developments which have made the punishment of offenders and the escalating `penal crisis' one of the most hotly debated issues of the day. They also outline the theories which purport to justify and explain the practice of punishment and consider their value in helping us understand the penal system. The Second Edition presents a stimulating account of the current crisis. The authors argue that the penal system not only suffers from severe practical pr |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 88
Page 91
... levels of sentence that are typically imposed for similar offences by the lower courts . One notable example of this gap in sentencing levels ( Ash- worth , 1983a ) was the 1980 case of R. v . McCann , 33 in which the Court of Appeal ...
... levels of sentence that are typically imposed for similar offences by the lower courts . One notable example of this gap in sentencing levels ( Ash- worth , 1983a ) was the 1980 case of R. v . McCann , 33 in which the Court of Appeal ...
Page 106
... levels of court , as we saw earlier . If a set of presumptive penalties were to be constructed on the basis of Court of Appeal recommendations , for example , this would drastically inflate the tariff in the lower courts and would have ...
... levels of court , as we saw earlier . If a set of presumptive penalties were to be constructed on the basis of Court of Appeal recommendations , for example , this would drastically inflate the tariff in the lower courts and would have ...
Page 197
... levels would be an ' unbalanced approach ' which would add undesirably to the overall quantum of punishment ' ( Carlisle , 1988 : para . 293 ) . It added that if a reduction in general sentencing levels were not achieved , and the new ...
... levels would be an ' unbalanced approach ' which would add undesirably to the overall quantum of punishment ' ( Carlisle , 1988 : para . 293 ) . It added that if a reduction in general sentencing levels were not achieved , and the new ...
Contents
Crisis? What Crisis? | 8 |
Justifying Punishment | 32 |
Explaining Punishment | 58 |
Copyright | |
10 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
Ashworth bail cautioning Cavadino cent Chapter committed community sentences convicted Court of Appeal crime Criminal Justice Act criminal justice system crisis of legitimacy Crown Court Crown Prosecution Service custodial sentences decarceration decisions defendants deterrence developments disciplinary dispersal prisons early release effect England and Wales example HM Prison Service HMSO Home Office Home Office Research Home Secretary imprisonment increase inmates Justice Act 1991 juvenile law and order levels London magistrates Marxist Michael Howard NACRO Nathan non-custodial offender's order ideology overcrowding Parole Board particular Penal Affairs Consortium penal crisis penal policy penal system penalties political practice prison officers prison population prison privatization Prison Reform Trust Prison Service prison system private prisons probation service problem programme prosecution punishment punitive recent reduce reintegrative shaming remand reparation response result retributivism riots sector serious social control society staff strategy suspended sentence tariff theory Tumim Woolf Report young offenders