The Archaeology of Knowledge: And the Discourse on LanguageMadness, sexuality, power, knowledge—are these facts of life or simply parts of speech? In a series of works of astonishing brilliance, historian Michel Foucault excavated the hidden assumptions that govern the way we live and the way we think. The Archaeology of Knowledge begins at the level of "things aid" and moves quickly to illuminate the connections between knowledge, language, and action in a style at once profound and personal. A summing up of Foucault's own methodological assumptions, this book is also a first step toward a genealogy of the way we live now. Challenging, at times infuriating, it is an absolutely indispensable guide to one of the most innovative thinkers of our time. |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 60
Page 144
... regularity of statements . In this sense , regularity is not in opposition to irregularity , which , in the margins of current opinion or the most frequent texts , characterizes the deviant statement ( abnormal , prophetic , retarded ...
... regularity of statements . In this sense , regularity is not in opposition to irregularity , which , in the margins of current opinion or the most frequent texts , characterizes the deviant statement ( abnormal , prophetic , retarded ...
Page 145
... regularities opens up in several directions that one day perhaps will be explored with greater care . - 1. A group of statements is characterized , then , by a certain form of regularity , without it being either necessary or possible ...
... regularities opens up in several directions that one day perhaps will be explored with greater care . - 1. A group of statements is characterized , then , by a certain form of regularity , without it being either necessary or possible ...
Page 146
... regularity whose specificity it is the duty of archaeology to describe ) . Inversely , it may ignore differences of vocabulary , it may pass over semantic fields or different deductive organizations , if it is capable of recognizing in ...
... regularity whose specificity it is the duty of archaeology to describe ) . Inversely , it may ignore differences of vocabulary , it may pass over semantic fields or different deductive organizations , if it is capable of recognizing in ...
Contents
Introduction | 3 |
The unities of discourse | 21 |
Discursive formations | 31 |
Copyright | |
19 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
according Analysis of Wealth appearance archaeology articulated basis belong Benoît de Maillet characterized coherence concepts concerned consciousness constitute contradiction correlations define deployed describe determine discipline discontinuity discover discursive formation discursive practice dispersion domain economic eighteenth century elements emergence enunciative field enunciative function established example existence fact formulation grammar group of statements Hegel history of ideas identity individual Indo-European languages Jean Hyppolite knowledge language langue Lastly limits linguistic linked Linnaeus logical madness Madness and Civilization meaning medicine modalities Natural History nineteenth century notions objects œuvre operation origin particular philosophy Physiocratic play political Port-Royal positivity possible principle problem proposition psychopathology question rediscover refer regularity relations reveal role rules of formation scientific sentence signs speaking subject specific speech act status structure succession system of formation teleology theme theory things thought threshold tion transformations truth types unity whole words