Connecticut Bar Journal, Volume 60State Bar Association of Connecticut, 1986 - Bar associations Includes Annual reports, and lists of members. |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 50
Page 8
The Chief Justice wrote an opinion in a sexual assault case on the defendant's claim that Section 54-86f of the General Statutes should apply to him as well as to victims.21 The Court agreed with the defendant , although it found that ...
The Chief Justice wrote an opinion in a sexual assault case on the defendant's claim that Section 54-86f of the General Statutes should apply to him as well as to victims.21 The Court agreed with the defendant , although it found that ...
Page 10
Justice Shea was not sitting for this case , but Chief Justice Peters was , and she dissented from the majority of Justices Dannehy , Healey , Santaniello and Callahan on the distinction made between res judicata and double jeopardy .
Justice Shea was not sitting for this case , but Chief Justice Peters was , and she dissented from the majority of Justices Dannehy , Healey , Santaniello and Callahan on the distinction made between res judicata and double jeopardy .
Page 11
The Chief Justice wrote a unanimous decision that once again showed deference to the legislature and discussed in scholarly terms the constitutional theory behind the various constitutional standards of review of statutes .
The Chief Justice wrote a unanimous decision that once again showed deference to the legislature and discussed in scholarly terms the constitutional theory behind the various constitutional standards of review of statutes .
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Contents
EDITORIAL | 1 |
DEVELOPMENTS IN CONNECTICUT | 13 |
INDEX TO VOLUME 59 1985 Victor M Gordon | 61 |
Copyright | |
12 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
action activity addressed advertising alleged Amendment Appellate Court applied architecture Association Attorney authority award Board cause City Civil Rights claim client Company concluded conduct Conn Connecticut considered constitutional contamination continued contract corporation Criminal Law custody damages decision defendant denied Department determine Developments discharge effect employee employment establish evidence existing expression fact federal Hartford held Holmes income injury interest involving issue joint judge judgment judicial jurisdiction jury Justice lawyer legislation liability limited litigation matter motion negligence Office opinion particular parties permit person plaintiff Planning pollution practice prior procedures protection question reasonable regulations restrictions result Rights rule solicitation speech Stat statute style Super supra note Supreme Court tort trial court Trib United violation writing zoning