Groupthink: Psychological Studies of Policy Decisions and FiascoesGroupthink - the psychological drive for consensus at any cost that suppresses disagreement and prevents the appraisal of alternatives in cohesive decision-making groups. In the first edition (Victims of groupthink), Iriving L. Janis showed how this phenomenon contributed to some of the major U.S. foreign policy fiascos of recent decades: the Korean War stalemate, the escalation of the Vietnam War, the failure to be prepared for the attack on Pearl Harbor, and the Bay of Pigs blunder. He also examined cases, such as the handling of the Cuban Missile Crisis and the formulation of the Marshall Plan, where groupthink was avoided. Here, in this revised and expanded edition, Janis applies his hypothesis to the Watergate cover-up, portraying in detail how groupthink helped to put the participants on a disastrous couurse and keep them there. In addition, he presents some fresh ideas on how and why groupthink occurs and offers suggestions for avoiding it. |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 37
Page 126
What Johnson leaves out of his account is that United States negotiations with
Polish officials continued for more than a week after the first scheduled meeting
date and that while those meetings were going on the United States launched
two ...
What Johnson leaves out of his account is that United States negotiations with
Polish officials continued for more than a week after the first scheduled meeting
date and that while those meetings were going on the United States launched
two ...
Page 138
Eighteen Soviet ships—some of them almost certainly carrying nuclear
armaments—continued relentlessly on their course toward the quarantine zone.
During the next few suspenseful days the United States repeated its threat to
board Soviet ...
Eighteen Soviet ships—some of them almost certainly carrying nuclear
armaments—continued relentlessly on their course toward the quarantine zone.
During the next few suspenseful days the United States repeated its threat to
board Soviet ...
Page 213
Dean continued to be highly regarded as having the right stuff by his superiors
during the next six months. In February 1973, Nixon, Haldeman, and Ehrlichman
agreed that Dean should have more direct contact with the President. Initially this
...
Dean continued to be highly regarded as having the right stuff by his superiors
during the next six months. In February 1973, Nixon, Haldeman, and Ehrlichman
agreed that Dean should have more direct contact with the President. Initially this
...
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Contents
Or Why the Fortress Slept | 72 |
The Cuban Missile Crisis | 132 |
The Making of the Marshall Plan | 159 |
Copyright | |
8 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
accepted according action administration Admiral advisers alternative American appears asked assumptions attack avoid Bay of Pigs become called Chiefs cohesive Committee concerning consensus consequences continued course cover-up crisis critical Cuba Cuban danger Dean decision decision-making Defense deliberations Department direct discussion effect evidence example Executive expected fact factors feel fiasco forces give going groupthink Haldeman invasion involved issues Japanese Johnson judgment Kennedy leader leading major March meetings military missile moral Nixon norms North objections officers operation participants Pearl Harbor policy-making political position possible present President pressures probably problem procedures proposed questions responsible result risks role says Secretary seems Senator shared social Soviet staff stress strong suggested symptoms of groupthink thinking threat tion transcripts Truman United Vietnam warning Watergate White House
References to this book
Bibliographic information
| Title | Groupthink: Psychological Studies of Policy Decisions and Fiascoes |
| Author | Irving Lester Janis |
| Edition | 2, illustrated, revised |
| Publisher | Houghton Mifflin, 1982 |
| Original from | the University of California |
| Digitized | 30 Jan 2007 |
| ISBN | 0395317045, 9780395317044 |
| Length | 349 pages |
| Subjects | › Psychology / Social Psychology |
| Export Citation | BiBTeX EndNote RefMan |