Groupthink: Psychological Studies of Policy Decisions and FiascoesGroupthink - the psychological drive for consensus at any cost that suppresses disagreement and prevents the appraisal of alternatives in cohesive decision-making groups. In the first edition (Victims of groupthink), Iriving L. Janis showed how this phenomenon contributed to some of the major U.S. foreign policy fiascos of recent decades: the Korean War stalemate, the escalation of the Vietnam War, the failure to be prepared for the attack on Pearl Harbor, and the Bay of Pigs blunder. He also examined cases, such as the handling of the Cuban Missile Crisis and the formulation of the Marshall Plan, where groupthink was avoided. Here, in this revised and expanded edition, Janis applies his hypothesis to the Watergate cover-up, portraying in detail how groupthink helped to put the participants on a disastrous couurse and keep them there. In addition, he presents some fresh ideas on how and why groupthink occurs and offers suggestions for avoiding it. |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 62
Page 198
... up : How Clever Manipulators Can Get Caught in an Avoidable Quagmire Unique features of this case study The case study presented in this chapter differs from those ... Cover-up: How Clever Manipulators Can Get Caught in Avoidable Quagmire.
... up : How Clever Manipulators Can Get Caught in an Avoidable Quagmire Unique features of this case study The case study presented in this chapter differs from those ... Cover-up: How Clever Manipulators Can Get Caught in Avoidable Quagmire.
Page 201
... for the Watergate break - in , all three admit that they were not innocent bystanders in- sofar as the cover - up was concerned . Explanations of how the cover - up fiasco came about Of the millions of words published about Watergate ...
... for the Watergate break - in , all three admit that they were not innocent bystanders in- sofar as the cover - up was concerned . Explanations of how the cover - up fiasco came about Of the millions of words published about Watergate ...
Page 217
... up a presidential investigation commission where John Dean and other aides would give testimony acknowledging some of their complicity . But none of the alternatives was examined carefully in terms of pros and cons ... Cover - up 217.
... up a presidential investigation commission where John Dean and other aides would give testimony acknowledging some of their complicity . But none of the alternatives was examined carefully in terms of pros and cons ... Cover - up 217.
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
Acheson administration Admiral Kimmel advisers advisory group Allen Dulles alternative American assumptions attack avoid Bay of Pigs bombing CALIFORNIA LIBRARY Castro Chiefs of Staff Chinese cohesive group Communist concurrence-seeking consensus course of action critical Cuba Cuban missile crisis danger Dean Defense deliberations discussion effect Ehrlichman enemy evidence Executive Committee expected fiasco group dynamics groupthink hypothesis groupthink syndrome groupthink tendencies Haldeman Hawaii Ibid in-group inner circle invasion plan Japanese Johnson Joint Chiefs Kennan Kennedy's Korean War leader major Marshall Plan McNamara meetings military moral naval Nixon norms North Korea North Vietnam officers participants Pearl Harbor Pentagon Papers policy-making group political present President Kennedy President's pressures problem procedures psychological questions responsible risks Robert Kennedy role Rusk Schlesinger Secretary shared social Sorensen Soviet Union stereotypes stress symptoms of groupthink thinking threat tion transcripts Truman UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA Vietnam Vietnam War warning Watergate cover-up White House group